Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00396903
NCT00396903CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of a Standard Epidural Catheter During Clinical Practice

Maastricht University Medical Center1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: April 2003Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Frequency of paraesthesia during catheter insertion

Study Overview

Brief Summary

During the insertion of epidural catheters several complications can occur, including transient paraesthesia and inadvertent venous cannulation.

Reported incidences for paraesthesia vary widely between about 0.2% and 50% in different articles, depending on the catheter (catheter material, soft-tipped or firm-tipped catheter), the applied technique (lumbar or thoracic epidural anesthesia, depth of catheter insertion), the approach (midline or paramedian) and the included patients (obstetrical or non-obstetrical). Furthermore, the inconsistent definition of "paraesthesia" makes it difficult to compare the results of different studies. Paraesthesia are not supposed to lead to permanent neurological sequelea, but are unpleasant and perturbing sensations for the patient.

For inadvertent venous cannulation during epidural catheter placement, incidences between 1% and 14% have been reported. As for the paraesthesia rate, catheter material, technique, approach and included patients are determinants for the incidence of vessel puncture.

Main objective of this study is to determine the incidence of paraesthesia with this catheter.

Secondary objectives are to record

  • the frequency of inadvertent venous cannulation
  • difficulties involved in insertion and removal of the catheter
  • data on additional complications
  • data for the evaluation of handling characteristics

Detailed Description

Study design

This study is a prospective, uncontrolled, open, non-randomised study ("Observational Study") with a CE-certified medical device.

Patients

Information and consent Information of the procedure and oral consent of epidural anaesthesia for the surgery is obtained as usual. Oral consent for data collection has to be obtained. No randomisation or blinding is performed and no non-standard procedures are necessary.

Inclusion criteria 100 patients scheduled for Epidural Anaesthesia will be included in this study. Eligible patients are ASA class I-III, between 18 and 75 years of age and are scheduled for EA, with or without general anaesthesia.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • scheduled for Epidural Anaesthesia
  • ASA class I-III
  • between 18 and 75

Exclusion Criteria

  • contraindications for epidural anaesthesia
  • Non-competent and non-cooperative
  • pregnant and breast-feeding women
  • medicament- and drug abuse or problems in communication
  • participating in parallel in another clinical study with experimental drugs or devices

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Frequency of paraesthesia during catheter insertion

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials