Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06381492
NCT06381492CompletedNot Applicable

Quantifying Patellar Tendon Microstructure Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging

University of Wisconsin, Madison1 site in 1 country62 target enrollmentStarted: May 21, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
62
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Compare scalar parameters of known patellar tendon pathology to the contralateral tendon

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to understand how diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) relates to other traditional measures and knee function. The main question it aims to answer is:

Will regions of known patellar tendon pathology present with smaller DTI scalar parameters, shorter fiber length, and lower fiber density compared to the contralateral tendon and healthy regions in the ipsilateral tendon.

Participants will:

  • undergo MRI and ultrasound imaging
  • perform knee function test
  • complete questionnaires

Detailed Description

Patellar tendon injuries are commonly accompanied by macrostructural alterations captured on common imaging modalities, and the extent of these alterations correlate to knee joint function. Evidence for using tendon macrostructure for diagnosis and prognosis of tendon injuries is not as clear, suggesting that these imaging modalities are not providing a complete picture of the alterations. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography can quantify tendon microstructures that underlie the alterations in pathological tendons and shows promising results in healthy tendons. This study is the first step in evaluating whether tendon microstructure captured using DTI technology can be applied as a biomarker to optimize treatment for patellar tendon injuries.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Control
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 or older
  • Have patellar tendon injury as confirmed through subjective report, clinical examination, and ultrasound by an experienced physical therapist
  • Patellar tendinopathy group must present with current symptoms of patellar tendinopathy
  • Control group must have no history of patellar tendon injury

Exclusion Criteria

  • Participants with a history of invasive procedures other than bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft harvest to the patellar tendon or extensor mechanism
  • Participants with history of contralateral BPTB autograft harvest, or ACLR using any other graft type
  • Participants with contraindications to MRI
  • Participants with contraindications to NMES

Arms & Interventions

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB)

This group will have patellar injury confirmed through self-reported surgical history and evidence of ipsilateral BPTB graft harvest on ultrasound.

Intervention: MRI (Device)

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB)

This group will have patellar injury confirmed through self-reported surgical history and evidence of ipsilateral BPTB graft harvest on ultrasound.

Intervention: Ultrasound (US) (Device)

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB)

This group will have patellar injury confirmed through self-reported surgical history and evidence of ipsilateral BPTB graft harvest on ultrasound.

Intervention: Neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) (Device)

Patellar tendinopathy group

This group will have patellar tendinopathy confirmed based on International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus on Clinical Terminology (ICON) statement, which defines patellar tendinopathy as "persistent patellar tendon pain and loss of function related to mechanical loading." Ultrasound diagnosis must confirm alteration of tendon macrostructure.

Intervention: MRI (Device)

Patellar tendinopathy group

This group will have patellar tendinopathy confirmed based on International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus on Clinical Terminology (ICON) statement, which defines patellar tendinopathy as "persistent patellar tendon pain and loss of function related to mechanical loading." Ultrasound diagnosis must confirm alteration of tendon macrostructure.

Intervention: Ultrasound (US) (Device)

Patellar tendinopathy group

This group will have patellar tendinopathy confirmed based on International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus on Clinical Terminology (ICON) statement, which defines patellar tendinopathy as "persistent patellar tendon pain and loss of function related to mechanical loading." Ultrasound diagnosis must confirm alteration of tendon macrostructure.

Intervention: Neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) (Device)

Healthy knees

Control group of participants with healthy knees

Intervention: MRI (Device)

Healthy knees

Control group of participants with healthy knees

Intervention: Ultrasound (US) (Device)

Healthy knees

Control group of participants with healthy knees

Intervention: Neuromuscular electric stimulation (NMES) (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Compare scalar parameters of known patellar tendon pathology to the contralateral tendon

Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks

DTI parameters will be obtained by built-in diffusion-weighted sequences on the GE MRI machine. Regions of interest will be selected using clinical scans, and region specific DTI parameters will be compared between regions and over the repeat test sessions

Compare DTI scalar parameters of known patellar tendon pathology to the healthy regions in the ipsilateral tendon

Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks

DTI parameters will be obtained by built-in diffusion-weighted sequences on the GE MRI machine. Regions of interest will be selected using clinical scans, and region specific DTI parameters will be compared between regions and over the repeat test sessions

Rank patellar tendon loads during exercise

Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks

Patellar tendon loads will be obtained by tensiometer measurements during common exercises for patellar tendon rehabilitation while subject wears NMES sensors. Patellar tendon loads will be compared between regions and over the repeat test sessions.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials