Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT05489302
NCT05489302Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE) Alt-RAMEC vs Conventional Rapid Palatal Expansion Randomized Controlled Trial -CBCT Study

Al-Azhar University1 site in 1 country42 target enrollmentStarted: June 20, 2022Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
42
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
amount of maxillary protraction
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study of this study is to compare two protocol of maxillary protraction in class III adolescent after using (MSE) Alt-RAMEC vs conventional rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
13 Years to 17 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Class3 Patients suffering maxillary collapse with a skeletal background
  • •Patients with retrognathic maxilla.
  • •Patients with anterior cross-bite or incisor end-to-end relationship
  • •Patients with unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
  • •Patients with no periodontal disease.
  • •Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
  • •No systemic diseases that may affect bone quality or interfere with orthodontic treatment.
  • •Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •previous orthodontic treatment.
  • •Craniofacial syndrome.

Arms & Interventions

(MSE) conventional protocol

Active Comparator

Intervention: Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with conventional protocol (Device)

(MSE) Alt-RAMEC protocol

Active Comparator

Intervention: Maxillary skeletal expander with protraction face mask with Alt-RAMEC protocol. (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

amount of maxillary protraction

Time Frame: 6 months

protraction of maxilla using CBCT

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamed Abdelrhman Shendy Abdelrhman

lecturer

Al-Azhar University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Enrolling By Invitation
Phase 2
Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Micro-osteoperforations Versus Injectable Platelet Rich FibrinEffects of Movement of Teeth Assiste Wit MOPS and I-prf
NCT05960825Al-Azhar University18
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase 1
Assesment of Two Different Modalities of Maxillary Canine Retraction Assisted With Injectable Platelet Rich FibrinEffect of Platelet Rich Fibrin Tooth Movement
NCT05429437Al-Azhar University18
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction ProtocolsMalocclusion, Angle Class IIICrossbite (Anterior) (Posterior)
NCT03712007University of Sao Paulo35
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
To compare the increase in length of the upper jaw with or without bone support in patients with one side split lip and palate using 3D x-ray
CTRI/2019/06/019597Dr Shuvadeep Dutta
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding ApplianceANB , SNA, SNBDental IntrusionMandibular RotationOpenbite Teeth | Teeth and Gum | Dental
NCT05433051Al-Azhar University24