Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00980746
NCT00980746
Completed
Phase 2

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2 093) as Therapy for Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial

Bial - Portela C S.A.0 sites557 target enrollmentNovember 2007

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Eslicarbazepine acetate
Conditions
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Sponsor
Bial - Portela C S.A.
Enrollment
557
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2007
End Date
November 2008
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Bial - Portela C S.A.
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Men and women aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2
  • Diagnosis of pain attributed to diabetic neuropathy for more than 1 year prior to enrolment
  • Stable glycemic control: (total glycated haemoglobin \[HbA1c\] level ≤ 11% at screening)
  • Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study
  • Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation
  • A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the Numeric rating pain scale (NRPS) in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of diabetic origin
  • Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders
  • Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years
  • Peripheral vascular disease with a history of amputation, except amputation of toes
  • Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values \< 30 mL/min at screening
  • Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ \<130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases \>2.0 times the upper limit of normal, white blood cell count (WBC) \<2,500 cells/mm3)
  • Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
  • History of non-compliance

Arms & Interventions

ESL 400 mg BID

ESL 400 mg twice daily (BID)

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 800 mg QD

ESL 800 mg once-daily (QD)

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 600 mg BID

Eslicarbazepine 600 mg twice daily

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 1200 mg QD

Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate

ESL 800 mg BID

Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg twice daily

Intervention: Eslicarbazepine acetate

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain

Time Frame: 17 weeks

Endpoint mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the treatment period. Likewise, baseline mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the baseline period.

Similar Trials