跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01733927
NCT01733927已完成3 期

An Evaluation of an Oral Rapid Test for HIV

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 497 人开始时间: 2010年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
497
试验地点
2
主要终点
The sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test in oral fluid (OraQuick Advance)compare to the ELISA test for HIV.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study, conducted in Santiago-Chile, was to:

  1. Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of OraQuick Advance oral rapid test (OQA)when compared to ELISA;
  2. Track the number of people in the study who returned for their ELISA test HIV results; and
  3. Analyze the perception among participants of the use of OQA compared to ELISA testing for HIV screening.

详细描述

Human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) continues to be one of the most devastating worldwide pandemics. In response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS in 2010, urged countries to improve access to HIV/AIDS testing and counseling in an effort to increase the number of people who know their HIV status, thereby attempting to decrease transmission and increase treatment. Thus, an effective country response is to increase voluntary testing and counseling, particularly among at-risk populations. Ensuring patients receive their test results is an essential component of these efforts.

Chile, since 1991, has seen an increase of notified cases of HIV/ AIDS among certain regions of the country. The Chilean government offers free screening for HIV using only the ELISA test. In addition, many Chileans fail to return to receive their test results, as do many other individuals worldwide. In the United States, the Center for Disease Control reported that when using the "gold standard of HIV testing" (the ELISA) 30% of people with negative results and 39% of people with positive results do not return for their test results.

In Western counties, as well as several Latin American countries, the use of rapid testing technology to identify HIV 1 and 2 has increased the percentage of people who learn their serological status when compared with those who are tested using the traditional ELISA method. Neither the rapid test nor ELISA yield a definitive diagnosis, so further confirmation testing is required using the Western Blot to rule out the possibility of a false positive result. Nonetheless, by providing quick turn-around, rapid testing helps to facilitate individuals receiving their initial test results, thereby increasing the their probability of being quickly referred to appropriate health services for confirmatory testing and treatment.

Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently has approved six different rapid tests for clinical use to detect HIV 1 and 2, the OraQuick Advance Rapid Assessment (OQA) is the only one that is administered orally.

OQA testing can be conducted in geographical locations where laboratory facilities capable of performing ELISA assays are unavailable. Thus, HIV screening programs that adopt OQA can extend their reach far beyond previous locations.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years old or older
  • Seeking ELISA testing to learn their HIV status (group 1) or
  • Having been confirmed HIV positive through Western Blot testing (Group 2)

排除标准

  • HIV positive currently under antiretroviral medication

结局指标

主要结局

The sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test in oral fluid (OraQuick Advance)compare to the ELISA test for HIV.

时间窗: 1 day (Immediately after the participants had taken their ELISA test for HIV or when recruited in case of people living with HIV.)

OraQuick Advance rapid oral test (OQA) was administered to people living with HIV (PLWH) who were not under Anti-retroviral treatment. The PLWH had a previous positive ELISA test and confirmed diagnose with a Western-blot. People who didn't know their HIV diagnose, and who had come to the clinic for an ELISA test for HIV were also administered OQA test after they had completed their ELISA test.

次要结局

  • The number of people who received their result from the ELISA for HIV test, versus the number of people who receives their OQA results.(Clinic staff notified patient of their ELISA test results for up to three weeks after their clinic visit.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

An Evaluation of a Rapid Test for HIV | 临床试验