Interrater Reliability of Subjective Pupillary Assessments

Completed

• Conditions: Interrater Reliability Among Pupillary Assessments

• Registration Number: NCT02296606
• Lead Sponsor: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Brief Summary

Prospective, observational, non-randomized study of interrater reliability of pupillary assessments, comparing two clinical assessments to the Pupillometer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-01
• Primary Completion: 2014-08
• Study Completion: 2014-10
• Study First Submitted: 2014-11-18
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-11-19
• Study First Posted: 2014-11-20
• Results First Submitted: 2016-04-26
• Results First Submitted QC: 2017-05-16
• Status Verified: 2017-12
• Results First Posted: 2017-12-15
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-12-19
• Last Update Posted: 2018-01-19

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 127

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients are eligible for this study if they have been diagnosed with some form of brain trauma (e.g., stroke, traumatic brain injury, aneurysm)

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Prisoners
• Under 18 years of age

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1. Explore the Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments When Conducted in the Natural Setting by a Diverse Group of Practitioners	9 months of pupillary assessments	Two human assessors conducted and recorded the results of a clinical pupillary assessment on one patient within 5 minutes of one another. The researcher then conducted and recorded pupillary information on the same patient (within the same 5 minute window) using the NeurOptics Pupillometer.