Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02701543
NCT02701543
Completed
Not Applicable

Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease With the Ranger Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter (Study Arm) Versus the IN.PACT Drug Eluting Balloon (Control Arm)

University of Leipzig1 site in 1 country414 target enrollmentOctober 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Peripheral Artery Disease
Sponsor
University of Leipzig
Enrollment
414
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Patency rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

To compare two different Paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of high grade stenotic or occluded lesions in Superficial femoropopliteal artery (SFA )and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) patients with Rutherford class 2-4.

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, multi-center 1:1 randomized trial. Patients will be stratified according to lesion length (≤ 10 cm/ \> 10 cm and \< 20 cm / \> 20 cm and ≤ 30 cm). Each strata will include approximately 138 patients. The trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Ranger™ Drug Coated Balloon in comparison to the IN.PACT™ Drug Coated Balloon in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease. All enrolled subjects will be followed through to 24 months to assess the incidence of restenosis by ultrasound and major adverse events (MAE). Follow-up visits occur at 1, 6, 12 and 24-month intervals per local standard of care. Telephone follow-up visits will occur at 36, 48 and 60 month. Up to 414 patients will be enrolled at approximately 10-18 sites in Germany for comparison between the following two groups: Treatment with the Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA) vs. the IN.PACT™ Drug Eluting Balloon (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MI, USA).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2015
End Date
December 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
University of Leipzig
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dierk Scheinert

Prof. Dr.

University of Leipzig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject age ≥ 18
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing Rutherford category 2-
  • Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion.
  • Target lesion length is ≤ 30cm
  • Target lesion is at least 1cm below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
  • Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 30 cm.
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation.
  • Patency of at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery.
  • A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
  • Angiographic evidence of severe calcification
  • Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion.
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  • Presence of a stent in the target lesion
  • Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion.
  • Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Any surgical procedure or intervention performed within 30 days prior to or post index procedure
  • Superficial femoropopliteal Artery or Proximal popliteal artery disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the index procedure
  • Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as stenting, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patency rate

Time Frame: 1 year

Efficacy: patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or \> 0.15 when compared to post-procedure ) or restenosis with Peak Velocity Ratio \> 2.4 evaluated by Duplex Ultrasound

Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization

Time Frame: 1 year

Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization

Secondary Outcomes

  • secondary Safety(60 months)
  • Walking capacity(6,12,24 months)
  • improvement shift in Rutherford classification(6,12,24 months)
  • Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) rate(6,12,24 months)
  • binary restenosis(6,12,24 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials