Efficacy of alternate day versus daily oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia- A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- To assess the efficacy of alternate versus twice daily oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Iron deficiency anemia is the leading cause of nutritional anemia in India. It can cause both hematological as well as non hematological consequences such as stunted growth and impaired cognitive functions.Large amount of unabsorbed iron can cause gastric inflammation and decrease the compliance. Alternate day Iron therapy is more efficient than daily Iron therapy in improving the hemoglobin levels and this can be attributed to the increased hepcidin levels after daily Iron dose. Hepcidin is a negative regulator of iron absorption and increased levels will lead to decrease iron absorption.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Computer generated randomization
- Masking
- Open Label
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 6.00 Month(s) to 10.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients between 6 months to 10 years of age diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who have received blood transfusion in past 3 months, oral or injectable iron supplements, patients with hemoglobinopathies, premature infants born before 32 weeks of gestation, patient with active infection.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
To assess the efficacy of alternate versus twice daily oral iron therapy in children with iron deficiency anemia
Time Frame: Over a span of one year
Secondary Outcomes
- 1. Effect of alternate versus twice daily oral iron therapy on serum hepcidin levels(2. To compare the GI side effects in both the groups that may affect the compliance.)
