A Efficacy and Safety Study of Adjunctive Perampanel in Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizures

Phase 3

Completed

• Conditions: Seizure Disorder Generalized Tonic Clonic
• Interventions: Drug: Perampanel; Drug: Placebo comparator

• Registration Number: NCT01393743
• Lead Sponsor: Eisai Inc.

Brief Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of perampanel on Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic (PGTC) seizure frequency in adolescents and adults maintained on one to two stable antiepileptic drugs (AED).

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, adjunctive-therapy study with an open-label Extension Phase. The Core Study consists of 2 phases: Prerandomization and Randomization. The Prerandomization Phase consisted of 2 periods: Screening (up to 4 weeks) and Baseline (4 or 8 weeks, depending on the accuracy of diary-documented seizures during Screening), during which participants will be assessed for eligibility to participate in the study. The Randomization Phase consisted of 3 periods: Titration (4 weeks), Maintenance (13 weeks), and Follow-up (4 weeks; only for those participants not entering into the Extension Phase). At the start of the Randomization Phase, eligible participants will be randomized to the perampanel or placebo treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. The extension phase consists of 142 weeks.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2011-07-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2011-07-12
• Study First Posted: 2011-07-13
• Study Start: 2011-09
• Primary Completion: 2014-05
• Results First Submitted: 2015-05-29
• Study Completion: 2015-11
• Results First Submitted QC: 2015-12-07
• Results First Posted: 2016-01-11
• Status Verified: 2017-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-07-27
• Last Update Posted: 2017-08-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 163

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Perampanel	Perampanel	Participants received 6 tablets (initially 1 tablet of 2-mg perampanel plus 5 tablets of perampanel matched placebo) and up-titrated weekly in 2-mg increments to a target dose range of 8 mg per day maintaining the blind with administration of 6 tablets per day of either perampanel/placebo.
Placebo	Placebo comparator	Participants received 6 tablets of perampanel matched placebo, once a day.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Median Percent Change in Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure Frequency (PGTC) Per 28 Days During the Titration and Maintenance Periods (Combined) Relative to Baseline (Prerandomization) - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks), Titration (4 weeks), and Maintenance (13 weeks)	Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the participant diaries. PGTC seizure frequency per 28 days (as determined from participant diaries) was calculated as the number of PGTC seizures divided by the number of days in the interval and multiplied by 28. The percent change from baseline in PGTC seizure was analyzed over the Titration and Maintenance Periods combined, while baseline was defined as seizure frequency per 28 days based on all valid diary data during the Prerandomization Phase.
50% Responder Rate for Primary Generalized Tonic Clonic Seizure During Maintenance - LOCF - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks) and Maintenance (13 weeks)	A responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days during Maintenance-last observation carried forward (LOCF) from prerandomization. The data was presented as the percentage of participants.
50% Responder Rate in Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days Relative to the Core Study Prerandomization Phase - (for Extension Phase)	Week 1 of perampanel treatment to date of last dose of perampanel in the Extension Phase	Responder rate was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in PGTC and total seizure frequency during treatment per 28 days relative to baseline (responder). Week 1 began on the date of first dose of the perampanel treatment regardless of whether it occurred in the Core Study or Extension Phase and continued to and included the date of the last dose of perampanel in the Extension Phase. For any given analysis window and seizure type(s), a 50% response from Core Study Prerandomization is a participant whose seizure frequency per 28 days for that seizure type(s) during that analysis window is 50% to 100% lower than his or her Core Study Prerandomization baseline seizure frequency per 28 days for that same seizure type(s). In Part B of the Extension Phase (after Visit 15), the seizure diary is only completed for days on which a seizure occurred and missing days were imputed as non-seizure days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled PGTC Seizures - (for Core Study)	For each participant, from the first treatment dose till 30 days after the last dose or up to 21 weeks for core study and 142 weeks for extension phase.	An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening (i.e., the subject was at immediate risk of death from the AE as it occurred; this did not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form or was allowed to continue, might have caused death), required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a subject who was exposed to the study drug). In this study, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (defined as an AE that started/increased in severity on/after the first dose of study medication up to 30 days after the final dose of study medication) were assessed.
Median Percent Change in All Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days During the Titration and Maintenance Periods (Combined) Relative to Baseline (Prerandomization) - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks), Titration (4 weeks), and Maintenance (13 weeks)	Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the participant diaries. PGTC seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of PGTC seizures divided by the number of days in the interval and multiplied by 28. The percent change in seizure frequency relative to baseline (prerandomization) for all seizures (PGTC, myoclonic, absence and all other seizures that occur during the study) per 28 days during the Titration and Maintenance Periods combined was analyzed.
Median Percent Change in Primary Generalized Seizure Subtype Frequency Per 28 Days During the Titration and Maintenance Periods (Combined) Relative to Baseline (Prerandomization) - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks), Titration (4 weeks), and Maintenance (13 weeks)	Seizure frequency per 28 days was derived from the information recorded in the participant diaries. PGTC seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated as the number of PGTC seizures divided by the number of days in the interval and multiplied by 28. The percent change in seizure frequency relative to baseline (prerandomization) for primary generalized seizure subtype (myoclonic and absence) per 28 days during the Titration and Maintenance Periods combined was analyzed.
50% Responder Rate for All Seizures During Maintenance-LOCF - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks) and Maintenance (13 weeks)	All seizures included PGTC, myoclonic, absence and all other seizures that occur during the study. A responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days during Maintenance- LOCF from prerandomization. The data was presented as percentage of participants.
50% Responder Rate for Primary Generalized Seizure Subtype During Maintenance Period - LOCF - (for Core Study)	Baseline (4 or 8 weeks) and Maintenance (13 weeks)	Primary generalized seizure subtype included absence and myoclonic seizures. A responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days during Maintenance - (LOCF) from prerandomization. The data was presented as the percentage of participants.
Percent Change From Core Study Prerandomization Phase in Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days - (for Extension Phase)	Date of first dose of study drug to date of last dose of study drug in the Extension Phase	Week 1 began on the date of first dose of the perampanel treatment regardless of whether it occurred in the Core Study or Extension Phase and continued to and included the date of the last dose of perampanel in the Extension Phase. For any given analysis window and seizure type(s), a 50% responder from Core Study Randomization is a participant whose seizure frequency per 28 days for that seizure type(s) during that analysis window is 50% to 100% lower than his or her Core Study Prerandomization baseline seizure frequency per 28 days for that same seizure type(s). In Part B of the Extension Phase (after Visit 15), the seizure diary is only completed for days on which a seizure occurred and missing days were imputed as non-seizure days.
Summary of Percent Change From Pre-Perampanel Baseline in Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days - (for Extension Phase)	Weeks: 1 to 13, 14 to 26, 27 to 39, 40 to 52, 53 to 65, 66 to 78, 79 to 91, 92 to 104, 105 to 117, 118 to 130, 131 to 143, greater than or equal to 144	Efficacy assessments included seizure counts from participant diaries. The percent change in seizure frequency was assessed during the perampanel treatment duration, with the pre-perampanel baseline being used for evaluating the change. The pre-perampanel baseline was defined as follows: 1) for all participants who had been assigned to placebo treatment in the Core Study, the pre-perampanel baseline was computed from all valid seizure diary data during the Core Study, and 2) for participants who had been assigned to perampanel in the Core Study, the pre-perampanel baseline was computed from all valid seizure diary data during the Prerandomization Phase plus the 4 weeks prior to the Prerandomization Phase of the Core Study. The perampanel treatment duration consisted of: 1) the Randomization Phase of the Core Study plus the Extension Phase for participants assigned to perampanel in the Core Study, and 2) the Extension Phase for participants assigned to placebo in the Core Study.