Comparison between Erector Spinae plain block and General Anaesthesia for Video Assisted Thoracoscopy
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/11/029336
- Lead Sponsor
- Ispat General Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All patients posted for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery having ASA grading I, II & III. BMI <30
Exclusion Criteria
Known allergy to local anaesthesia, local infection at the site of injection & patient refusal.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Erector spinae plain block is better than general anaesthesia in providing complete anaesthesia for patients undergoing thoracoscopy(VATS).Timepoint: Six Months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall patients satisfaction and long term complications, if any.Timepoint: One Year