A Pilotstudy Investigating the Impact of Image Modifications on Subjective Image Quality
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Modulation Transfer Function
- Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- subjective image quality
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 12 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Human visual acuity and contrast sensitivity are highly dependent on various different parameters. Each should be optimized for perfect visual performance. However, in real life our eyes lack such parameters, which might lead to unsatisfying results even after spectacle correction or contact lenses.
A promising approach would be to design intra ocular lenses (IOL), which are implanted into the eye for example in the course of cataract extraction and are able to compensate for the human eyes' aberrations.
For example cutoff frequency, edge-sharpness or specific contrast for selected structure sizes would need to be considered. Since, an aberration free optical system is almost impossible and since the impact of each single parameter is not yet known, IOL design parameters would have to be chosen very carefully.
Furthermore, image quality of IOLs still is tested ex vivo by ray tracing for example, but this does not guarantee perfect function after implantation, as our visual system has complex image precessing units form the retina to the brain.
The present study picks one of these parameters and seeks to assess its impact on visual quality in-vivo. By subjectively grading different images with objective changes to image quality by variations of the modulation transfer function (MTF), the potential influence and thus on our subjective visual impression shall be assessed.
Investigators
Gerhard Garhofer
assoc. Prof. Dr.med.univ.
Medical University of Vienna
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Men and women aged between 18 and 35 years, nonsmokers
- •Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically irrelevant
- •Normal ophthalmic findings, emmetropia or ≤ 1 diopter
Exclusion Criteria
- •Regular use of medication, abuse of alcoholic beverages, participation in a clinical trial in the 3 weeks preceding the study
- •Treatment in the previous 3 weeks with any drug (except oral contraceptives)
- •Symptoms of a clinically relevant illness in the 3 weeks before the first study day
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
subjective image quality
Time Frame: 1 study day
Secondary Outcomes
- subjective image sharpness(1 study day)