跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02285790
NCT02285790已完成不适用

Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma Using a One-stop-shop With Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2015年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
4
主要终点
Comparison between one stop shop using reflectance confocal microscopy in the surgical treatment of BCC and current standard of care using punch biopsy, by assessing incomplete surgical excision on the final pathology report.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the one-stop-shop concept, using real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy as diagnostic tool, prior to surgical management of new primary basal cell carcinoma

详细描述

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in white populations worldwide. The rising incidence of BCCs is becoming a major worldwide public health problem (1,11). Between 1973 and 2009, the European standardized rate quadrupled from 40 to 165 per 100,000 person-years for men and from 34 to 157 for women, most probably as a result of more intensive UV exposure (12). This is supported by previous published epidemiological literature indicating that ultraviolet radiation is an important risk factor for BCC with a significant increase among outdoor workers (13,14). Despite the low mortality from BCC, multiple and recurring tumors confer a high morbidity and considerable burden for health care providers and health budgets. Although BCC does not seem to have a high effect on patients' quality of life, patients suffering from BCC are definitely interested in efficacy, low recurrence rates and cosmetic outcome of their therapies.(15). Meanwhile resources available at hospitals have not increased proportionally and therefore optimizing effectiveness of present treatment modalities in daily dermatologic practice is mandatory (16).

Clinically, BCC are characterized by small, translucent, or pearly papules, with raised teleangiectatic edges (17) . Most of the BCC occur in sun-exposed skin of the head and neck area (18,19). Sensitivity and positive predictive value for the clinical diagnosing of BCC by dermatologists has been reported to be 95.4% and 85.9%, respectively (20). However, dividing between BCC subtypes is not always possible upon clinical assessment. To date, histological analysis of punch biopsy remains the golden standard to confirm the clinical diagnosis of BCCs and dividing between the following subtypes: nodular (nBCC), micronodular (mnBCC), infiltrating (iBCC) and superficial (sBCC) (10). Of those, nBCC and sBCC have a less aggressive growth pattern in comparison to mnBCC and iBCC. Additionally, mixed type BCC (mtBCC) can be defined as a combination of subtypes and are frequently composed of aggressive subtypes (21). Surgical excision remains the standard of treatment, with Mohs micrographic surgery typically utilized for high-risk lesions (22). Based upon the histological growth pattern, BCC are surgically removed with a margin of either 3mm (nBCC and sBCC) or 5mm (mnBCC, iBCC) in accordance with current Dutch guidelines (10).

Due to the rising incidence of BCC there is a need for more efficient, non-invasive methods to diagnose BCCs. The use of real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to diagnose BCCs has proven successful to address this need. Various studies have demonstrated that RCM is safe and accurate (sensitivity and specificity) to diagnose BCCs(2-6). Reported sensitivity and specificity for RCM in diagnosing BCC range from 83%-100% and 79%-97%, respectively (7). Furthermore, Peppelman et al. and Longo et al. recently reported on RCM features that might divide between nodular, micronodular, superficial and infiltrative subtypes of BCC (8,9).

In 2012, van der Geer et al reported on the feasibility of a one-stop-shop (OSS) concept for the treatment of skin cancer patients (23). One-stop-shop implies that at the day of the initial outpatient clinic consultation, diagnosis and treatment plan both take place. In their study, pre-operative frozen section histology was used to confirm BCC diagnosis and subtype. The mean throughput time was 4 hours and 7 min, no complications were observed, and patient satisfaction was high (23). Incorporating RCM as non-invasive diagnostic tool in a BCC OSS concept for lesions suitable for conventional surgical excision might further reduce time between clinical diagnosis and treatment, administrative workload and costs.

The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the one-stop-shop concept, using real-time in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (Vivascope 1500; Lucid Technologies, Henrietta, NY, USA) as diagnostic tool, prior to surgical management of new primary BCCs, of all subtypes, in the general population.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with clinically suspected new primary BCC as assessed by an experienced board certified dermatologist
  • Patients seen at the outpatient clinic before 12h00 AM will be eligible to participate
  • Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
  • BCC lesion is suitable for conventional surgical excision under local anesthetics
  • BCC lesion is present since at least 1 month

排除标准

  • BCC lesion in a high-risk location of the face (H-zone and ears)
  • Contra-indication for conventional surgical excision (primary surgical closure seems not achievable)
  • Recurrent BCC lesion (BCC that has been previously unsuccessfully treated) Macroscopic ulcerating BCC lesions (not feasible for RCM analysis due to technical reasons)
  • Patients with basal cell nevus syndrome
  • Patients treated with hedgehog inhibitor medication
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to and/ or a history of allergy to local anesthesia
  • Unavailability within the following 6 weeks (for example due to holiday or sports)
  • Patients not competent to understand the procedures involved

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison between one stop shop using reflectance confocal microscopy in the surgical treatment of BCC and current standard of care using punch biopsy, by assessing incomplete surgical excision on the final pathology report.

时间窗: Within the first week after surgical excision of suspected BCC lesion

Assessment will be performed by an experienced board certified pathologist. The number of incomplete excisions will be compared between study- and control group.

次要结局

  • Comparison of patient satisfaction between study group and standard of care (control) group by using a standardized web-based questionnaire for patient reported outcome in the management of skin diseases (www.huidvragen.info)(As assessed at the post-operative visit 3 months after surgical excision)
  • Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) between RCM and punch biopsy in both diagnosing and subtyping BCCs(Within the first week after surgical excision of suspected BCC lesion)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Daniel Kadouch

Prof. dr. M.A. de Rie

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验