Comparison of ability of supraglottic airway(SGA) for children and infants under general anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Patient who undergo general anesthesia with SGA
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000024222
- Lead Sponsor
- Kanagawa childrens medical center
- Brief Summary
The OLP immediately after insertion was lower for the AuraGain than for the i-gel (17.1 vs. 23.0cmH2O; mean difference: -5.9cmH2O; 95% confidence interval: -8.5 to -3.3cmH2O; P=0.98 and <0.001 for noninferiority and superiority, respectively). The first-attempt success rate (AuraGain, 96% vs. i-gel, 90%; P=0.44) was comparable between the devices. The incidence of blood staining was lower (AuraGain, 6% vs. i-gel, 0%; P=0.012).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Emergent operation, Upper respiratory tract infection, Pulmonary disease, Medicalhistory or predictor of difficult airway management, Airway malformation, High risk of gastric regurgitation or vomitting, surgical technique that intubation needs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method