Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05989061
NCT05989061RecruitingNot Applicable

PEEK Versus Titanium Customized Healing Abutments: Evaluation of Peri-implant Soft Tissues and Sulcus Fluid Bacterial Load

Ain Shams University1 site in 1 country26 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
26
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Clinical evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The study suggests that if the investigators used customized healing abutments synthesized from PEEK may have a favorable effect on peri-implant soft tissues regarding decreased plaque accumulation and healing stimulation compared to the customized conventional titanium healing abutments.

Detailed Description

Successful aesthetic implant therapy has several sequential goals such as prosthetically driven 3D implant placement. Implant placement must be done in the ideal position to support the restoration and the surrounding soft and hard tissues. The placement of a definitive restoration should also be in harmony with the adjacent natural teeth and surrounding soft tissue.

Guided implant surgery can provide precise, predictable, and safe implant placement. Computer-generated surgical guides vary in design according to the dental condition (edentulous or partially edentulous), type of support (tooth, mucosa, or bone), and the degree of limitation (non-limiting, partially-limiting, or completely limiting).

The use of healing abutments has the function which enables adequate healing of peri-implant soft tissue and promoting a good profile of peri-implant mucosa that allows an adequate emergence profile of the prostheses supported by the implant. They are available in different lengths and project through the soft tissue into the oral cavity.

Janakievski stated that prefabricated healing abutments are unable to support the supracrestal soft tissues because of their circular profile. Therefore, a custom healing abutment is preferred because it provides a replica of the definitive restoration of the patient's gingival architecture.

An evaluation of the use of customized healing abutments has been performed aiming to assess possible advantages associated with this treatment modality. This procedure allows to maintain the peri-implant tissue and improve aesthetics until crown delivery. CAD/CAM enables the fabrication of high-quality implant abutments from solid blocks of different materials.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients should be systematically free from any disease as according to Cornell Medical Index-Health Questionnaire .
  • •Both genders.
  • •Age from 20-50 years.
  • •Missing tooth in esthetic zone (Anterior/Premolar) to be restored with standard implant, with no need for additional bone and soft tissue augmentation procedures.
  • •Implants primary stability ISQ ≥ 70 unites using the Osstell Mentor
  • •BuccoLingual bone width ≥ 6 mm.
  • •Mesio distal space ≥ 7 mm
  • •Sound Mesial and distal neighboring teeth.
  • •At least 6 natural teeth remaining in the same arch .
  • •Mouth opening ≥ 30mm.
  • •Enough keratinized mucosa.
  • •Thick phenotype.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Poor oral hygiene condition.
  • •Pregnant and lactating females.

Arms & Interventions

PEEK customized healing abutment.

Experimental

Group I (Customized PEEK Healing Abutment):

13 patients will receive guided delayed implant and a customized PEEK healing abutment placed simultaneously with implant surgery

Intervention: PEEK customized healing abutment (Device)

Titanium customized healing abutment.

Active Comparator

Group II (Customized Titanium Healing Abutment):

13 patients will receive guided delayed implant and a customized titanium healing abutment placed simultaneously with implant surgery.

Intervention: Titanium customized healing abutment (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes

Time Frame: 1 month after implantation and 4 months after implantation (just before prosthetic procedures)

Clinical evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes the Probing Depth (PD).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Biochemical evaluation(1 month after implantation and 4 months after implantation (just before prosthetic procedures))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Samar El Desouki

Principal Investigator

Ain Shams University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials