Physical Activity Interventions for Leg Ulcer Patients

Not Applicable

Completed

Brief Summary: The goal of this study is to test FOOTFIT and enhanced FOOTFIT+, home-based mobile health (mHealth) physical activity (PA) interventions for a minimally ambulatory, chronically-ill, population with leg ulcers. A highly sensitive clinically designed Bluetooth® enabled accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during a progressive and evidence-based non-exertive leg conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) captures minute foot movements and sends the data to a Smartphone. This six-week feasibility study will compare FOOTFIT to FOOTFIT+, with the added connectivity feature, to promote patient-provider communication, evaluate adherence to PA, and assess signals of efficacy on functional outcomes in a very low fitness population.

Detailed Description: FOOTFIT is a study of a lower leg conditioning mHealth intervention for patients with venous leg ulcers. The aims are to compare two versions, one of which is enhanced (FOOTFIT+), to determine which has the greatest impact on physical activity adherence, patient-provider communication, and leg function. FOOTFIT and FOOTFIT+ share three components: 1) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during, 2) phased conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) tracked by a, 3) Smartphone that captures signals from BEAT, provides motivational messages, CALF instruction, and automated feedback on progress. Forty patients will be targeted in this six-week study, 20 of which will receive FOOTFIT and 20 FOOTFIT+.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Active venous leg ulcer
Ankle brachial index 0.80 to 1.3 mmHg, a measure of arterial sufficiency
Sedentary-able to only walk a few steps at a time or not farther than 10 feet
Not currently exercising or participate in a PA or physical therapy program
Receives at least weekly wound care anticipated to last for at least six weeks from start of study
Able to don accelerometer - if unable to apply independently, has assistance from other
Capable of using Smartphone

Exclusion Criteria

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
FOOTFIT Plus	FOOTFIT	The intervention consists of: 1) a prescribed, evidence-based, phased, non-exertive physical activity conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) movements that are to be performed daily at home; 2) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive motion-sensing accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during CALF to capture frequency and intensity of foot movements; and 3) a Smartphone that receives foot movement data, provides automated educational/motivational messages, and reports and allows regular communication with the wound care provider on progress.
FOOTFIT	FOOTFIT	The intervention consists of: 1) a prescribed, evidence-based, phased, non-exertive physical activity conditioning activities for lower leg function (CALF) movements that are to be performed daily at home; 2) a low-cost, tri-axial Bluetooth® enabled highly sensitive motion-sensing accelerometer and tracking device (BEAT) worn on the foot during CALF to capture frequency and intensity of foot movements; and 3) a Smartphone that receives foot movement data, provides automated educational/motivational messages, and reports. There is not regular communication with the wound care provider on progress.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
FOOTFIT feasibility	6 weeks	Measure adherence by recording frequency and intensity of foot/toe movements reported in minutes.
FOOTFIT reach	6 weeks	Measure reach, recorded as qualitative documents on a log of how patients learned about the study.
FOOTFIT technology implementation procedures	6 weeks	Record on study log the number and types of problems encountered with the study nurses teaching participants to use the foot accelerometer technology, the number and types problems reported by patient, the number and types of recommendations made by the participant regarding the use of the accelerometer, and nurse or provider recommendations for changes to refine the foot accelerometer technology, and the number and types of refinements to the technology that were made.
FOOTFIT acceptability	6 weeks	Record on study logs the the number (frequency) and types of interactions such as phone calls, emails or texts, between the patient and provider regarding FOOTFIT+ including reasons (i.e., exercises, adverse events that are related to, and not related to the use of the accelerometer).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Efficacy on pain	6 weeks	Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on pain using the numerical rating scale (NRS) as a single score.
Efficacy on walking function.	6 weeks	Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on walking function using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and reported as a sum score.
Efficacy on foot strength	6 weeks	Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot strength using the dynamometer and reported as pounds per square inch.
Efficacy on foot range of motion.	6 weeks	Obtain estimates of variability for short-term functional impacts on foot range of motion using the goniometer and reported in degrees.
Efficacy on walking performance	6 weeks	The Six Minute Walk Test reported as distance in feet over six minutes time.

Locations (1): Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
🇺🇸
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States