Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2016/02/006685
CTRI/2016/02/006685
Completed
Phase 2

Primary skin closure versus delayed primary skin closure in reducing Surgical Site Infection in dirty midline abdominal operative wounds - A randomized controlled trialÂ

JIPMER0 sites66 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
JIPMER
Enrollment
66
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
JIPMER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •All patients operated for abdominal conditions in general surgery in which surgical incision falls into class\-IV\- dirty abdominal wound according to CDC which includes
  • •\-Operative wound with acute purulent bacterial inflammation or perforated viscus
  • •\-Operative wound where clean tissue is transected to gain access to a collection of pus
  • •\-Fecal contamination
  • •\-Retained devitalized tissue
  • •\-Traumatic wound with delayed treatment ( after 4 hours)
  • •\-Traumatic wound from dirty source/ Operative wound dirty
  • •\-Retained foreign body

Exclusion Criteria

  • •\-Patientâ??s refusal
  • •\-Patient treated outside before coming to the hospital
  • •\-Patients requires re\-exploration in the same hospital admission
  • •\-Patients in whom primary rectus closure is not possible or in whom laparostoma is warranted
  • •\-patient expires before discharge
  • •\-patient less than 18 years of age

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison between primary skin closure with drain and deleyed primary closure of wounds of perforation peritonitis- A randomized control trialHealth Condition 1: null- Patients with perforation peritonitis undergoing Exploratory laparotomy via midline incision.
CTRI/2020/02/023510Harjeet Singh
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of 2 types of skin sutures techniques in hip replacement surgery
CTRI/2018/09/015664sunshine hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparing Skin Closure Techniques: Sutures versus Staples at Tezpur Medical College and HospitalHealth Condition 1: K35- Acute appendicitisHealth Condition 2: K811- Chronic cholecystitisHealth Condition 3: K265- Chronic or unspecified duodenal ulcer with perforationHealth Condition 4: K565- Intestinal adhesions [bands] withobstruction (postinfection)Health Condition 5: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene
CTRI/2024/03/063767Dr Tapash Kumar Kalita
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Delayed skin suturing after Emergency abdomen surgeryHealth Condition 1: K650- Generalized (acute) peritonitisHealth Condition 2: K650- Generalized (acute) peritonitis
CTRI/2023/02/050019Maulana Azad Medical College,
Completed
Phase 4
A comparison of skin closure method between staples and sutures in total knee replacement patients. A prospective randomized controlled trial.Total knee replacementSutures StaplesWound closure
TCTR20140312001Faculty of medicine, Prince of Songkla university60