MedPath

The Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Muscle Spasticity
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01256021
Lead Sponsor
Medy-Tox
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Meditoxin® in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy.

Detailed Description

The allocated subject is injected Meditoxin® 4U/kg body weight(for patients with hemiplegia) or 6U/kg body weight(for patients with diplegia)in the affected gastrocnemius muscle for the treatment of patients who suffer Equinus Foot Deformity with pediatric cerebral palsy due to spasticity.

The efficacy and safety are evaluated for 12weeks through 3 follow up visits.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
212
Inclusion Criteria
  • Pediatric patients aged between 2 and 18 years with diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy
  • Patients with toe-walking due to peroneal muscle spasticity (patients with equinus foot deformity due to spasticity)
  • Patients who voluntarily consent to participate in this study and whose legally acceptable representative has signed the informed consent form (if the patient is able to write, his/her signature should be also obtained).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who had previously received botulinum toxin within 3 months prior to the study entry
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin
  • Patients who requires legs, feet or ankle surgery at present
  • Patients with severe athetoid movement
  • Patients who is participating in other investigational study at present
  • Patients, by the investigator's discretion, who are not suitable for this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treatment Group 1Botulinum Toxin Type AMeditoxin
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean change from baseline in MAS score from baseline to week 44 weeks

The investigator assessed MAS score using a 5-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 2

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean change from baseline in MAS score from baseline to week 1212 weeks

The investigator assessed MAS score using a 5-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 2

Mean change from baseline in VAS(Visual Analogue Scale)assessed by caregiver/patient from baseline to week44, 12 weeks

Individual goals of treatment were chosen one among pain, ease of care, standing, walking. The VAS used in this study is a straight 10cm horizontal line with anchor points of very satisfied (score 0)and very dissatisfied (score 10).

Mean change from baseline in PROM(Passive Range of Motion of ankle) at ankle dorsiflexion from baseline to week 4, 124, 12 Weeks
Improvement in Global Assessment assessed by caregiver/patient4, 12 weeks

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Seoul National Universtiy Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

🇰🇷

Seongnam, Korea, Republic of

Asan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Yonsei University Severance Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath