Neuroregeneration Enhanced by TDCS in Stroke
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Enrollment
- 119
- Locations
- 11
- Primary Endpoint
- Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Testing the hypothesis that non-invasive brain stimulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with functional training in the subacute phase of first-ever stroke will enhance functional regeneration compared with a Placebo intervention.
Detailed Description
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability, which significantly impairs the economic and social life of patients and society. Every year 200 000 to 250 000 patients suffer a stroke in Germany. Only a small number of the stroke survivors recover to a degree that allows them to return into their professional and private life. Despite significant efforts to develop novel and efficient treatment strategies the level of functional regeneration is still not satisfying. Thus, the development of innovative and effective treatment strategies will have a major impact for the patients' life, the society and the public health system. Within the proposed project an innovative, non-invasive and cost effective interventional strategy, based on the combination of a specific rehabilitative training and brain stimulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), will be used to enhance functional regeneration in stroke patients. The intervention will be applied in an early stage in which plasticity, cortical reorganization and functional improvement is most pronounced. We hypothesize that the combination of anodal tDCS delivered to the motor cortex of the affected hemisphere combined with training over a period of two weeks in the subacute stage after stroke will significantly enhance cortical plasticity, functional regeneration and long-term outcome determined by clinical and functional outcome measures compared with Placebo stimulation.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subacute stroke patients (5-45 days after stroke) with thromboembolic non-hemorrhagic subcortical or cortical, first clinically overt stroke will be included. Moderate to moderately severe upper-extremity hemiparesis, defined as an Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score (UEFMA) between 20 and 58 (inclusive).
Exclusion Criteria
- •pre-existing large lesions (\> 1.5 cm maximum diameter) in a brain area that belongs to the anatomically established sensorimotor/premotor system
- •progressive stroke
- •completely lesioned hand knob area of M1 affected if no motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are present
- •bilateral motor impairment
- •florid alcohol and/or drug abuse
- •florid severe psychiatric illness (e.g. schizophrenia)
- •severe language disturbances that prevents the patient to give informed consent or inhibit adequate scoring because of insufficient understanding of scoring introductions
- •tumor diseases with a life expectancy less than one year
- •increased intracranial pressure
- •polyneuropathy and/or ischemic peripheral disease if the sensorimotor functions of the upper extremities are affected clinically relevant
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)
Time Frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
standardized test of upper extremity function
Secondary Outcomes
- Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)(90±20 days after the intervention)
- Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA) | Long-term outcome(12±1 months after the intervention)
- Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)(90±20 days after the intervention)
- Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)(90±20 days after the intervention)
- Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | Long-term outcome(12±1 months after the intervention)
- Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)(90±20 days after the intervention)
- Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) | Long-term outcome(12±1 months after the intervention)
- Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) | Long-term outcome(12±1 months after the intervention)
- Box-and-Block Test(12±1 months after the intervention)
- Grip Force(12±1 months after the intervention)