Comparison of the Effects of Vecuronium and Cisatracurium on Electrophysiologic Monitoring During Neurosurgery
- Conditions
- General AnesthesiaSpine TumorNeurosurgeryCerebral AneurysmMotor Evoked Potential MonitoringBrain Tumor
- Interventions
- Other: MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of cisatracurium during general anesthesiaOther: MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of vecuronium during general anesthesia
- Registration Number
- NCT01690364
- Lead Sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Recently intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring (MEP) is widely used to reduce neural damage during neurosurgery.
As neuromuscular blockade(NMB) during MEP monitoring decreases the amplitude of MEP, partial NMB is usually maintained during general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of NMB agent is preferred than bolus infusion during MEP monitoring. There are a lot of NMB agents in clinical use. But there have been no reports about the effect of changing NMB agent on efficacy of MEP monitoring.
Therefore, the investigators performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of changing NMB agent on the variability of MEP amplitude during neurosurgery.
- Detailed Description
Recently intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring (MEP) is widely used to reduce neural damage during neurosurgery.
As neuromuscular blockade(NMB) during MEP monitoring decreases the amplitude of MEP, partial NMB is usually maintained during general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of NMB agent is preferred than bolus infusion during MEP monitoring. There are a lot of NMB agents in clinical use. But there have been no reports about the effect of changing NMB agent on efficacy of MEP monitoring.
Therefore, the investigators performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of changing NMB agent on the variability of MEP amplitude during neurosurgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 74
- Adult patients undergoing neurosurgery with intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring
- Patients who can not undergo motor evoked potential monitoring due to central or peripheral neuromuscular disease (e.g. Cerebral palsy, Myasthenia gravis, Acute spinal injury, neurologic shock)
- Patients with hepatic or renal disease with altered metabolism of vecuronium
- Patients with medication which influence the metabolism of vecuronium (e.g. calcium channel blocker, aminoglycoside antibiotics, Lithium, MgSO4)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Cisatracurium Group MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of cisatracurium during general anesthesia MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of cisatracurium during general anesthesia Vecuronium Group MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of vecuronium during general anesthesia MEP monitoring with continuous infusion of vecuronium during general anesthesia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method MEP amplitude 300 min after anesthetic induction intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring amplitude
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Average of MEP amplitudes at the end of the surgery (5H after the start of surgery) Average of all measured MEP amplitudes in a subject
Average of Latency of MEP amplitude at the end of the surgery (5H after the start of surgery) Average of Latency of MEP amplitude
Coefficient of variation (CV) of MEP amplitude at the end of the surgery (5H after the start of surgery) Coefficient of variation (CV) of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring amplitude
The frequency of adjusting the infusion dose of muscle relaxant at the end of the surgery (5H after the start of surgery) The frequency of adjusting the infusion dose of muscle relaxant
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Samsung Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of