MedPath

A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Health Care Utilization
Adherence, Patient
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Survivorship
Childhood Cancer
Interventions
Behavioral: Multi-level Intervention of shared model of survivorship care
Other: Comparison Group
Registration Number
NCT05448560
Lead Sponsor
Georgetown University
Brief Summary

More than 80% of childhood cancer survivors develop serious or life-threatening late effects after cancer therapy, but \<20% receive recommended survivorship care offered at cancer center survivorship clinics. In a shared care model, the investigators propose to investigate an innovative multi-level intervention consisting of: 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center, 2) ongoing patient-tailored education program within the electronic health record patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone communication between the cancer center and the primary care clinic, and 4) an in-person visit with the primary care clinic for survivorship care with the goal of achieving high rates of adherence to recommended surveillance for late effects, as well as improving patient and physician knowledge and self-efficacy. If this scalable intervention demonstrates patient completion of recommended care comparable to cancer center survivorship clinics, this innovative study has the enormous potential to deliver recommended care to a larger proportion of childhood cancer survivors and reduce survivorship care disparities, while engaging p to integrate survivorship care as part of overall, lifelong health maintenance.

Detailed Description

More than 80% of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) develop serious or life-threatening late effects. Yet \<20% of CCS receive recommended survivorship care, despite the availability of consensus guidelines for lifelong surveillance for late effects starting 2 years post-therapy. The "gold standard" cancer center-based survivorship clinic provides high-quality care to CCS who attend, but patients avoid reminders of their past cancer and lack knowledge and self-efficacy for survivorship care. Other barriers include travel distance, inadequate insurance, and out-of-pocket costs-these structural issues contribute to health disparities. Partnering with community primary care provider (PCP) clinics in a shared model of care is a promising strategy to overcome these barriers, but PCPs lack knowledge, self-efficacy, and interactive communication with the cancer center and are confused about the division of care responsibilities. This intervention is scalable and distance-based, is informed directly by patient and PCP barriers and preferences from previous studies, and is boosted by a nationwide explosion in telehealth services precipitated by the COVID-19 crisis. The proposed randomized controlled trial will enroll 240 CCS 2.0-4.0 years post-chemotherapy/radiation to investigate an innovative multi-level intervention (i.e., interpersonal and organizational levels) consisting of 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center, 2) ongoing patient-tailored education program within the electronic health record (EHR)'s patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone communication between the cancer center and the PCP clinic (with 1-year follow-up call), and 4) an in-person visit with the PCP clinic for survivorship care. The comparison group will be randomized to an in-person visit with their cancer center survivorship clinic. This study includes 4 centers with high proportions of subgroups vulnerable to survivorship care disparities (i.e., rural, Black, Latinx, Spanish-speaking, socioeconomically disadvantaged). Both groups will be asked to begin recommended surveillance for late effects within 1-year post-randomization, separate from tumor recurrence monitoring by the primary oncologist. The Specific Aims are to Aim 1- Demonstrate patient completion of guideline-recommended surveillance tests in intervention participants is not inferior, i.e. within 10%, to that in the comparison group; Aim 2- Achieve greater 1) patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation and 2) PCP knowledge and self-efficacy with survivorship care among intervention participants and their PCPs compared to the comparison group; and Aim 3- Ascertain process outcomes for the 1) patient and 2) PCP clinic. Outcomes will also be assessed among subgroups with survivorship care disparities. Transformative Impact: If the intervention demonstrates patient completion of recommended survivorship care comparable to cancer center survivorship clinic, the study has the enormous potential to deliver recommended lifelong care to a larger proportion of CCS and reduce survivorship care ies, while engaging patients and PCPs to integrate survivorship care as part of overall, lifelong health maintenance.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
240
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Diagnosed with any cancer at age <21 years
  2. Treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation
  3. 2.0-4.0 years status post-completion of all cancer-related therapy
  4. Cancer-free with a life expectancy of ≥2 years
  5. English- or Spanish-speaking (also applies to parent/guardian if patient age <18 years)
  6. No previous attendance at a specialty survivorship clinic
  7. Followed at one of the 4 participating sites: Hackensack, University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill (UNC), University of Colorado Denver (CU), Miller's Children's and Women's Hospital Long Beach (MCWH)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Active medical problems severe enough to not be eligible for receiving survivorship care with primary care provider at the time of recruitment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Multi-level Intervention of shared model of survivorship careMulti-level Intervention of shared model of survivorship care1. Patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center 2. Ongoing patient-tailored education program by MyChart within the EHR patient portal 3. Structured interactive phone communication between the research RN at the cancer center and community PCP clinic 4. In-person visit with the PCP clinic for survivorship care.
"Gold standard" cancer center-based survivorship clinicComparison GroupIn-person visit at specialty survivorship clinic
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient completion of guideline-recommended surveillance tests for late effects of therapy2 years post-randomization

The investigators will assess adherence to surveillance recommended by the Children's Oncology Group Long-term Follow-up Guidelines. The primary analysis will be on tests completed by patients, and not just ordered by physicians, because that is the most meaningful indicator of patient adherence to guidelines

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient Healthcare Self-Efficacy2-years post-randomization

Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale (score range 1-10, higher score indicates greater self-efficacy) to be administered to patients and proxies

Process Outcomes for Patients1-year post-randomization

Patients will complete a survey regarding process outcomes (i.e., feasibility, fidelity, acceptability) associated with the multi-level intervention. Note that results are not reported on a scale.

Patient Knowledge:2-years post-randomization

Patient Knowledge Survey developed by Kadan-Lottick et al. for the Childhood Cancer Survey Study which is a 9-item survey regarding treatment history, risk of late effects, need for survivorship care, and purpose of the survivorship care plan. Note that results are not reported on a scale.

Process Outcomes for Primary Care Physicians1-year post-randomization

Primary care physicians will complete a survey regarding process outcomes (i.e., feasibility, fidelity, acceptability) associated with the multi-level intervention. Note that results are not reported on a scale.

Patient Activation2-years post-randomization

The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM) will be administered to participants to evaluate the level of patient activation, i.e. patient self-reported knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management of one's health or chronic condition. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting greater patient activation.

PCP Knowledge and Self-Efficacy2-years post-randomization

Survey consisting of questions regarding the PCPs' familiarity with the surveillance guidelines and confidence in providing survivorship care. Note that results are not reported on a scale.

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Children's Hospital Colorado

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Hackensack University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

University of North Carolina Children's Hospital

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

MemorialCare Miller Children's & Women's Hospital Long Beach

🇺🇸

Long Beach, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath