A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus in Korean Nephropathy Patients
- Registration Number
 - NCT01224028
 
- Lead Sponsor
 - Astellas Pharma Inc
 
- Brief Summary
 This study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in the patients with non-nephrotic albuminuric, normotensive IgA nephropathy after 16 week treatment with tacrolimus (Prograf) or placebo.
- Detailed Description
 Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
 - COMPLETED
 
- Sex
 - All
 
- Target Recruitment
 - 40
 
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with IgA nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy
 - Serum creatinine measurement ≤1.5mg/ml or MDRD estimated GFR ≥ 45ml/min/1.73m2 (MDRD: Modification of Diet in Renal Disorder)
 - UACR level between 0.3 and 3.0
 - Blood pressure measurements < 130/80mmHg
 
Exclusion Criteria
- Use of immunosuppressants for more than two weeks within last one month
 - Concomitant use of ACE inhibitor, ARB, steroids or immunosuppressant, NDHP-CCB, diuretics, omega-3 fatty acids and its analogue & additional dietary to treat igA nephropathy (ACE: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme, ARB: Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, NDHP-CCB: Non-dihydropyridine-type Calcium Channel Blocker
 - Pregnant or breast-feeding patients. Patients who plan to bear children or breast-feed during the study and within 6 month after completion of study
 - Hypersensitivity to the investigational drug or macrolide agents
 - Use of potassium-sparing diuretics
 - Persistence of liver function abnormality more than 1 month or presence of acute active hepatitis
 - Other investigational drug within last 30 days
 
Study & Design
- Study Type
 - INTERVENTIONAL
 
- Study Design
 - PARALLEL
 
- Arm && Interventions
 Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo - Tacrolimus group Tacrolimus - 
- Primary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Percent change from baseline UACR to mean value of UACR measured on week 12 and week 16 (UACR: Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio) Week 0, week 12 and week 16 
- Secondary Outcome Measures
 Name Time Method Proportion of subjects achieving more than 30% reduction of UACR level from baseline Week 0 and week 16 Composite event rate achieving less than 0.2 or 50% reduction of UACR level Week 0 and week 16 Incidence of adverse events according to subject's self-assessment, vital signs, investigator's assessment and labo-tests Through week 16 Proportion of subjects achieving more than 50% reduction of UACR level from baseline Week 0 and week 16 Proportion of subjects achieving more than 0.2 reduction of UACR level Week 0 and week 16 Changes of UACR measured between before the study and each visit Week 0, week 4, week 8, week 12 and week 16 
