Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self-cured Universal Adhesive Versus Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs): 18 Month Randomized Clinical Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 28
- Primary Endpoint
- number of restoration with retention loss
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of self-cured adhesive versus light cured universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) resin composite restorations after 18 month
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •particepant with age rang 18-55
- •particepant with non carious cervical lesion
Exclusion Criteria
- •particepant outside age rang
- •particepant with periodontal problem that might affect the teeth to be treated
Arms & Interventions
Light cure universal bond
light cured 3m single bond universal
Intervention: light cure 3m single bond universal bond (Other)
self cure universal bond
self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan)
Intervention: Self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan) (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
number of restoration with retention loss
Time Frame: 18-month
Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria
Number of fracture restoration
Time Frame: 18 month
Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss .followed by tactile inspection using fdi prob for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention
Secondary Outcomes
- Number of restoration with change in colour or texture(18 month)
- Number of restoration caused biological harm(18 month)
Investigators
Aya Gamal ashour
principle investigator
Cairo University