Comparison of General Anesthesia With Use of Muscle Relaxation and General Anesthesia Without Muscle Relaxation on Recovery of Muscle Strength of the Patients
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- General anesthesia for surgery
- Conditions
- Rocuronium
- Sponsor
- Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Muscle strenght recovery after general anesthesia
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Neuromuscular blocking agents are often used during general anesthesia. Also, general anesthesia may be performed without use of neuromuscular blocking agents.
Avoiding neuromuscular relaxation enables better muscle strength recovery.
Detailed Description
Rocuronium is well used neuromuscular blocking agent during general anesthesia. Although very often used, neuromuscular blocking agents may sometimes have consequence in form of residual neuromuscular block. Tha aim of the study is to compare influence of rocuronium during general anesthesia on muscle strength recovery measured by hand grip dynamometer. Measuremwnt of hand grip strength is perforrmed before and after general anesthesia. This research should contribute to better choice of anesthesia technique and better quality of patient recovery, as studies so far have not been detaily carried out. Hypothesis of the research is that anesthesia without use of neuromuscular blocking agents may enable better recovery of muscle strength in immediate postoperative period.
Investigators
Martina Miklic Bublic, MD, PhD
Principal investigator
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients ASA status I-III for surgery under general anesthesia
- •signed informed consent for participating in research
Exclusion Criteria
- •neuromuscular disease
- •poorly controled chronic or acute cardiovascular, respiratory or autoimmune disease
- •known allergic reaction to any medication used in this research
- •pregnancy
- •refusal to participate in this research
Arms & Interventions
Experimental group general anesthesia without rocuronium
30 patient ASA classification 1-2 for general anesthesia. Standard anesthesia monitoring. After induction with Propofol and Sufentanil ( doses adjusted according to weight and age) anesthesia was maintained with sevorane. Muscle strength measured on three occasions with Yamar dinamometar for hand grip strength, before induciran to anesthesia and immediate after Salingeru from anesthesia, then again measured in first 24 hours.
Intervention: General anesthesia for surgery
Active comparator: general anesthesia with rocuronium
30 patient ASA classification 1-2 for general anesthesia. Standard anesthesia monitoring with train-of-four (TOF). After induction with Propofol and Sufentanil (doses adjusted according to weight and age) and rocuronium 0,6 mg per kg, anesthesia maintained with sevorane. Muscle strength neasured with Yamar dinamometar for hand grip strength before induction to anesthesia and immediate after awakening from anesthesia, then again measured in first 24 hours.
Intervention: Rocuronium
Active comparator: general anesthesia with rocuronium
30 patient ASA classification 1-2 for general anesthesia. Standard anesthesia monitoring with train-of-four (TOF). After induction with Propofol and Sufentanil (doses adjusted according to weight and age) and rocuronium 0,6 mg per kg, anesthesia maintained with sevorane. Muscle strength neasured with Yamar dinamometar for hand grip strength before induction to anesthesia and immediate after awakening from anesthesia, then again measured in first 24 hours.
Intervention: General anesthesia for surgery
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Muscle strenght recovery after general anesthesia
Time Frame: Perioperative
Change in muscle strength recovery measured with hand grip dynamometer after general anesthesia with or without rocuronium. Better understanding of mechanism how neuromuscular blockade influences quality if patient recovery due to muscle strength recovery