MedPath

Patient Satisfaction With Different Numbers of Implants

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Patient Satisfaction
Interventions
Other: implants supported overdentures
Registration Number
NCT05882617
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

the goal of this randomized controlled trial aimed to assess patient satisfaction for completely edentulous patients with implant overdenture retained by ball attachment over a single symphyseal , or four interforaminal implants when compared to two interforaminal ones

Detailed Description

48 edentulous patients were recruited and randomized to receive either 1,2 or 4 implants for a mandibular overdenture,3 months later implants were uncovered, and ball attachments were torqued, and all overdentures were picked up ,patient satisfaction questionnaires were recorded for all patients 2 weeks after pickup 3 months ,6 months, 9 months and 1year.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria
  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • bruxers
  • smokers

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experimentalimplants supported overdenturessingle impalnts supported overdenture
active comparatorimplants supported overdenturestwo implants supported overdenture
othersimplants supported overdenturesfour implants supported overdenture
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
patient satisfaction for masticatory ability, mental life comfortability with denturesone year

A translated into Arabic form of patient satisfaction questionnaire to match the language and environmental background of the patients was answered by all subjects, Each response was given a score range from 0 to 4 where zero represents the best result . Questionnaire was divided into three categories questions, the first section was a direct questions to the patient answered by one of some choices, and each choice had a number which will be summed up and giving a score, The second section was a visual answered question; in which patient chose from best to worst on a given scale. The marked point will be translated into a number from zero (the best) to ten (the worst). The third section was a YES/ NO questions, answered shortly by the patient in the terms of yes or No.

A translated into Arabic form of patient satisfaction questionnaire to match the language and environmental background of the patients was answered by all subjects

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Doaa Mahmoud Elkady

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Nesma Mohamed Awaad

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath