The Effect of the Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique With Arm Movement on Pain, Grip Strength, and Functionality in Individuals With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Functional Status and Symptom Severity
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the Mulligan Spinal Mobilization with Arm Movement technique on pain, grip strength and functionality in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome and to compare it with the conventional neurodynamic mobilization technique. The study aims to answer the following questions:
Is the Mulligan spinal mobilization technique with arm movement superior to the conventional neurodynamic mobilization technique in terms of pain, grip strength, and functionality in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome? Does the Mulligan spinal mobilization technique with arm movement outperform the conventional neurodynamic mobilization technique in terms of pain, grip strength, and functionality in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome? The evaluation process took place in three stages for both groups: Baseline (pre-test), 6 weeks after the start of the study (post-test), and 12 weeks after the start of the study (follow-up test).
详细描述
Thirty participants completed the randomized controlled trial and were divided into two groups as the study group (Mulligan group) and the control group (conventional neurodynamic mobilization). Both groups received tendon gliding exercises (TGE) and strengthening exercises for the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the hand during the treatment period. The treatment period lasted six weeks, and after the end of the treatment, the individuals were followed up with a home program until the 12th week. Evaluations were performed three times at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks and included measures of pain (VAS, McGill), functionality (DASH, FDS, FDS), grip strength (Jamar hand dynamometer), range of motion and sensation (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test). The control group received Mulligan's neurodynamic spinal mobilisation technique at the C5-C6-C7 levels with arm movement for six weeks. This involved three sessions per week, each comprising three sets of three repetitions, with each repetition lasting an average of one minute. The total duration of each session was approximately ten minutes.
The control group received the same technique without the Mulligan approach for six weeks, three days a week, three sets of three repetitions, with each repetition lasting an average of one minute. After the treatment period, both groups performed a standard exercise programme consisting of tendon gliding and hand strengthening exercises, which were also recommended to patients at the end of each session. These exercises were continued throughout the follow-up period after treatment.
The study was completed between June 2023 and January 2025 with ethical approval from Istanbul Medipol University.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Having a diagnosis of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
- •Being between 20 and 60 years of age.
- •Having symptoms of paresthesia, pain, and numbness in areas of the hand related to the median nerve lasting more than six weeks.
- •A positive Tinel, Phalen, or carpal compression test during wrist examination.
排除标准
- •Pregnancy.
- •The patient has a contraindication to exercise.
- •Additional neurological, rheumatological, and orthopedic conditions.
- •A positive Spurling test.
- •Patients who have undergone surgery in the wrist or neck region.
- •Presence of a tumor or pathology in the cervical region.
- •Patients who have received physical therapy for the wrist or neck in the last six months.
- •The patient has mental health issues.
结局指标
主要结局
Functional Status and Symptom Severity
时间窗: Baseline, 6th week, 12th week
Functional status and symptom severity were evaluated using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, including the Functional Status Scale (FSS) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS). Each scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater disability (FSS) or more severe symptoms (SSS).
Pain Intensity
时间窗: Baseline, 6th week, 12th week
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), at rest and during activity with higher scores indicating worse pain.
Pain Intensity
时间窗: Baseline, 6th week, 12th week
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), at rest and during activity with higher scores indicating worse pain.
Functional Status and Symptom Severity
时间窗: Baseline, 6th week, 12th week
Functional status and symptom severity were evaluated using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, including the Functional Status Scale (FSS) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS). Each scale ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater disability (FSS) or more severe symptoms (SSS).
次要结局
- Sensory Function(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Hand Grip Strength(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Range of Motion of the Wrist(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Pain Quality - McGill Pain Questionnaire(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Hand Grip Strength(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Range of Motion of the Wrist(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Sensory Function(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
- Pain Quality - McGill Pain Questionnaire(Baseline, 6th week, 12th week)
研究者
Beste Gebologlu
Physiotherapist and Graduate Student Researcher
Medipol University