跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06362239
NCT06362239Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Prospective Analysis of the Impact of Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice Compared to Inpatient and Clinic Based Palliative Care

Steven Smith1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 250 人开始时间: 2024年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
250
试验地点
1
主要终点
Hospital Utilization Differences

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the addition of home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) will provide a reduction in health care utilization, improve quality of life, and facilitate goal-concordant care that is superior to inpatient and clinic pediatric palliative care (PPC) alone.

详细描述

Identify difference in outcomes between those that receive home-based hospice and palliative care (HBHPC) in conjunction with inpatient and clinic based palliative care compared to those who receive only inpatient and clinic based palliative care. Outcomes analyzed will include hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life as defined by the individual and/or primary caregivers through PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module survey, and delivery of goal concordant care by individual and family.

This is a prospective, multi-site, quasi-experimental design using an untreated comparison group with dependent pretest and posttest samples. This trial is being carried out at five sites including: Nationwide Children's Hospital (lead/primary site; Columbus, OH), Akron Children's Hospital (Akron, OH), Texas Children's Hospital (Houston, TX), Nemours Hospital (Wilmington, DE), and Medical University of South Carolina (Charleston, SC). The experimental group consists of all participants from sites with high-access HBHPC programs and the untreated comparison group consisting of all participants from sites with low-volume HBHPC. Protocols, consistent across all sites, are being submitted independently to the site's respective IRB for review and approval. The intent is to pool deidentified data for aggregate analysis by NCH.

This non-random design is selected because it is neither logistically feasible nor clinically ethical to conduct a randomized trial in which some participants would be allocated to not receive the intervention (HBHPC). Use of a pretest and comparison group minimizes threats to validity; the lack of randomization allows the potential for selection bias. However, we anticipate that given the diagnostic and clinical diversity of the sample, and the dearth of HBHPC access for pediatric patients, that clinical acuity will naturally be matched between both cohorts.

At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys. Study staff will recontact participants every three months to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff).

At or within the first few weeks of completing informed consent, participants will complete the study surveys (PEDSQL2 Family Impact Module Quality of Life survey and Goal Concordant Care survey). Study staff will recontact participants in three month intervals for a two year period or patient death if death occurs within study period to recomplete the surveys using a REDCap link, or paper surveys sent and returned, or completed by phone call via participant's preferred method (and entered into REDCap by study staff). NCH staff will create the REDCap, and give the template to each site for consistency purposes. Study staff will collect clinical and demographic information from the electronic medical record. Study staff will securely transfer site REDCap clinical, demographic, and survey data to the primary site (NCH) for analysis. Each site PI or CRC will complete their own patient follow up for survey completion. Any identifiable information will be stored separately from the study data and only PIs and coordinators at each site will have access to their own access to PHI. Aggregate data will be reviewed as a whole.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 19 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 0-19
  • Patients seen as new referral or follow up visit by PPC (Pediatric Palliative Care) team in either the inpatient or clinic context and expected to require at least twice-annual palliative care visits

排除标准

  • Followed by PPC regardless of context for >6 months prior to enrollment
  • Patient no longer clinically needs long term PPC follow up
  • Child / young adult is in custody of state or county

结局指标

主要结局

Hospital Utilization Differences

时间窗: At enrollment and every three months for a two year period for a maximum of 24 months

Hospital utilization including ICU days, inpatient hospital days, ED visits, quality of life

次要结局

  • Demographic Differences(Identified at time of study enrollment and does not require ongoing measurement.)
  • Location of death differences(From date of enrollment to date of death (if occurred) over study enrollment for a maximum period of 24 months.)

研究者

发起方
Steven Smith
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Steven Smith

MD

Nationwide Children's Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Prospective Home-Based Palliative Care and Hospice... | 临床试验