MedPath

Right Versus Left Apical Transvenous Pacing for Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function Study

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Bradyarrhythmia
Interventions
Device: Implantation procedure for a St-Jude Medical pacemaker system with right ventricular apex pacing
Device: Implantation procedure for a St-Jude Medical pacemaker system with left ventricular apex pacing
Registration Number
NCT01535404
Lead Sponsor
Haran Burri, MD
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare chronic (1-year) effects on left ventricular ejection fraction resulting from transvenous pacing of the right ventricular apex (RVA) versus the left ventricular apex (LVA) in patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular systolic function (\>= 45%).

Detailed Description

It is well established that chronic right ventricular apical pacing has an adverse effect on left ventricular systolic function. An alternative is pacing the left ventricular apex, which has shown more favourable results in terms of left ventricular pump function than the RVA in small series. The left ventricular apex may be paced via the coronary sinus tributary (e.g. in the anterior cardiac vein). Our study will compare effects of these two pacing sites on left ventricular ejection fraction measured by 3D-echocardiography.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Requirement for ventricular pacing according to current guidelines (including chronic atrial fibrillation)
  • Anticipated >=50% daily ventricular pacing
  • LVEF >=45% as evaluated by 2D-echocardiography, 3D-echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging or by radionuclide/contrast ventriculography
  • Minimum age of 18 years, and at least 1 year life expectancy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior tricuspid valve replacement (annuloplasty is permitted)
  • Intrinsic rhythm < 30bpm
  • Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation who undergo ablation of the atrioventricular node.
  • Echocardiographic window of insufficient quality for measuring LVEF
  • Life expectancy of < 1year
  • Pregnancy (women of childbearing potential will undergo pregnancy testing)
  • Unable of unwilling to sign a patient informed consent form

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Right ventricular apex pacingImplantation procedure for a St-Jude Medical pacemaker system with right ventricular apex pacing-
Left ventricular apex pacingImplantation procedure for a St-Jude Medical pacemaker system with left ventricular apex pacing-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reduction in LVEFbaseline to one year
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of device-related complicationsone year
Change in left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumesone year
Dyssynchrony evaluation during RV and LV pacingone year
Change in tricuspid regurgitation severity, if anyone year
Change in mitral regurgitation severity, if anyone year
Success rate of autocapture algorithm for left-and right-ventricular pacingone year
Mortality and all cause hospitalizationone year
Reduction of LVEF at 1 year compared to baseline according to the following pre-specified subgroups: a) initial LVEF, b) gender, c)etiology (coronary artery disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathy)one year

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Maastricht

🇳🇱

Maastricht, Netherlands

Cardiocentro Ticino (Lugano)

🇨🇭

Lugano, TI, Switzerland

Kantonsspital Luzern

🇨🇭

Luzern, LU, Switzerland

Kantonsspital St-Gallen

🇨🇭

St-Gallen, SG, Switzerland

University Hospital of Basel

🇨🇭

Basel, BS, Switzerland

University Hospital Geneva

🇨🇭

Geneva, GE, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath