MedPath

Randomized Clinical Trial; Medical vs Bariatric Surgery for Adolescents (13-16 y) With Severe Obesity

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Steatohepatitis
Inflammation
Diabetes
Hypertension
Obesity
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Procedure: Intense conservative treatment
Registration Number
NCT02378259
Lead Sponsor
Göteborg University
Brief Summary

Severe childhood obesity is associated with both immediate and chronic health problems and a severe impact on psychosocial development. Medical and behavioural interventions rarely result in the significant, durable weight loss necessary to improve health outcomes.

This is a randomised clinical trial where 50 adolescents, 13-16 years of age, will be randomised to either early bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) or intense conservative treatment and possibly surgery after two years of non-surgical treatment or as they have become 18 years.

Detailed Description

A multicentre randomised clinical trial where three tertiary referral hospitals recruit patients.

Patients and their parents receive information about the study at their paediatric clinic and at the trial web page (www.amos2.se). Standardised procedure, including signed informed consent.

Interventions

At the end of day of baseline examination patients are randomised to either of two arms:

* Bariatric surgery with regular follow up

* Optimised conservative treatment starting with an 8-week Low Calorie Diet period followed by tailored support and treatment by the multidisciplinary team with an intensity of at least one visits a month over at least 2 years

Patients in the conservative arm will be reassessed regarding interest of undergoing bariatric surgery two years after inclusion.

Sample Size A sample size of 50 (25+25) leaves a power of more than 95% to evaluate a possible superiority of \>10% weight difference between the two groups, assuming a 15% standard deviation in weight loss over follow-up at 2.5% significance level.

This number also allows assessment for differences in cardiovascular risk factors with sufficient power and acceptable power for demonstrating differences in quality of life and cognitive functions.

3.6 Randomization The computerized random allocation is performed during the day of baseline examination and patients were informed of their assignment. Forty-nine patients have been included until May 2017, and the last patient will be operated on June 14th. Stratification has been performed according to the recruitment centre

3.8 Statistical Methods \& Additional Analyses Safety \& Efficacy Outcomes: Analyses will be by intention to treat, including all randomised patients. Difference in treatment effect will be evaluated with hazard ratio between the treatment groups, and the corresponding confidence interval will be calculated. For secondary outcomes, the incidence of comorbidities during follow-up will be evaluated using time-to-event models, and for continuous variables mixed models will be used to evaluate differences between the treatment groups.

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; dividing the between-group difference in costs with the between-group difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) as well as life-years). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be conducted and results presented in an ICER scatterplot and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Follow-Up Clinical Data Collection: Study point are 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after the start of intervention. Weight, quality of life, and adverse events, as well as clinical data regarding treatments for co-morbidities. Blood sampling for assessment of nutritional deficiencies, glucose control, blood lipids and inflammation will be collected at baseline and 1, 2 and 5 years.

Cognitive functions: Assessments will be performed at baseline and 1 and 2 years after start of intervention.

Register-Based Data Collection and Health-Economic Outcomes: Collection and analysis of Swedish national health care and other official registries

We decided in the Study Steering Committee to change time points for long term follow up to be 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation to better comply with standard schedules for clinical follow up in registers (instead of 7, 12 and 17y after treatment initiation).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 13-16 years
  • BMI >35
  • Failed comprehensive treatment for obesity > 1 year
  • Passing assessment of psychologist
  • Tanner 3 or more
Exclusion Criteria
  • Monogenic obesity (for example Prader Willis, Laurence Moon-Bardet-Biedl)
  • Obesity secondary to brain injury
  • Severely mentally disabled
  • Not eligible for general anesthesia
  • Psychotic or other major psychiatric illness
  • Previous major gastrointestinal surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Bariatric surgeryLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypassRoux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery
Intense conservative treatmentIntense conservative treatmentIntense conservative treatment. 8 week LCD followed by outpatient visits 1/ month
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)2 years after treatment initiation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Socioeconomic development5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Education, civil status, number of children, income, sick leave (from national registries)

Health care consumption2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

In hospital care, outpatient care, prescribed medications; from national registries

Metabolic control2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Glucose control (fP-Glc, fs-Insulin, HbA1c, Oral glucose tolerance test), Blood lipids (HDL, LDL, TG, Apo A, Apo B), Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), Inflammation (LPK, CRP, Adiponectin, IL-6, TNF-alfa), liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP, Bil)

Addictive behavior2, 5, 10, 15 years after treatment initiation

Alcohol consumption, blood markers for alcohol consumption, drugs, brain response to visual stimuli

Adverse events2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Any adverse event (physical, mental or other)

Cognitive Function1, 2 and 5 years after treatment initiation

General cognitive functioning (IQ test- WISC-IV Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) Scale 1-200 where lower score means worse)

Working memory1, 2 and 5 years after treatment initiation

Memory (D-KEFS-Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) several subscales 0-15, lower value means worse

Obesity-specific quality of life2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Obesity Problem scale- 9 items (score 0-100, higher score= more psychosocial impairment)

Mental health2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Depression, anxiety, self esteem, stability in neuropsychiatric disease (ADHD, ADD), psychiatric illness, OCD

Energy expenditure5 years after treatment initiation

Doubly labelled water, basic metabolic rate, 24h energy expenditure chamber 5 years

Quality of life, generic2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Mental and physical quality of life assessed by Short Form-36 (score 0-100, lower= more disability)

Eating function2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Assessment of meal pattern, dietary composition and gastrointestinal symptoms in relation to eating

Attention1, 2 and 5 years after treatment initiation

Attention (NEPSY- NEuroPSYcologic examination). Separate subscales for executive function and attention, language, memory and learning, sensorimotor, visuospatial processing, and social perception. Lower value means worse.

Skeletal maturation and quality2, 5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Bone mineral content and bone mineral density will be assessed as well as blood markers for bone formation and resorption

Body Mass Index, body weight, height. Additional assessments of primary outcome5, 10 and 15 years after treatment initiation

Weight (kg) and height (m) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Sahlgrenska University hospital

🇸🇪

Gothenburg, Sweden

SkĂĄne University Hospital

🇸🇪

Malmö, Sweden

Karolinska University hospital

🇸🇪

Stockholm, Sweden

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath