跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04886232
NCT04886232已完成不适用

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparator-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VP1 Lido US for Volume Augmentation of the Cheek

Merz North America, Inc.20 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 202 人开始时间: 2021年5月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
202
试验地点
20
主要终点
Change from baseline to Week 12 on the Merz Cheeks Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS)

研究概览

简要总结

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of VP1 Lido US versus an approved hyaluronic acid dermal filler following deep (subdermal and/or supraperiosteal) injection of the cheek for volume augmentation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Has a symmetrical rating of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) for right and left cheek on the Merz Cheeks Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS)
  • Desires cheek augmentation to correct volume deficit in the midface and is willing to receive sufficient volume to achieve at least a 1-point improvement on the MCFAS

排除标准

  • Skin or fat atrophy in the midfacial region other than that related to age.
  • Subjects with body mass index of <18.5 or ≥30
  • Acute inflammatory process or active infection at the injection site (e.g., acne, eczema, streptococcus infections), or history of chronic or recurrent infection or inflammation with the potential to interfere with the study results or increase the risk of AEs.
  • Prior surgery, including midfacial plastic surgery, or has a permanent implant or graft in the midfacial region that could interfere with effectiveness assessments.
  • Received midfacial region treatments with porcine-based collagen fillers or with RADIESSE® or with volumizing hyaluronic acid fillers such as but not limited to Juvéderm® Voluma, Restylane® Lyft within the past 24 months and/or with other HA fillers or mesotherapy within the past 12 months or plans to receive such treatments during participation in the study.
  • Received facial dermal therapies (i.e., facial ablative or fractional laser, dermabrasion, chemical peels, non-invasive skin-tightening [e.g., Ultherapy®, Thermage®] and surgical procedures) in the midfacial region within the past 12 months or plans to receive them in the facial region during participation in the study.

结局指标

主要结局

Change from baseline to Week 12 on the Merz Cheeks Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS)

时间窗: Baseline to week 12

The MCFAS is a 5-point ordinal rating

次要结局

  • GAIS scores for treated subjects at Week 12, as completed by the subject(Week 12)
  • Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores for treated subjects at Week 12, as completed by the treating investigator(Week 12)
  • FACE-Q satisfaction with cheeks for treated subjects at baseline and Week 12(Week 12)
  • Responder rates at Week 12, according to the MCFAS, as assessed by three blinded board-certified Independent Panel Reviewers (IPRs) using subject photographs(Week 12)
  • Treatment response rate where response is defined as a ≥ 1-point improvement on both cheeks when comparing the change from baseline to Week 12(Baseline to week 12)
  • Incidence of related serious or delayed onset adverse events (>21 days after treatment) following the first treatment including touch-up until Week 48(Baseline to week 48)
  • Change from baseline to Week 12 on the MCFAS by injection type (cannula, needle)(Baseline to week 12)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (20)

Loading locations...

相似试验