Comparison of RIRS Versus PCNL Methods, According to Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Demand in 2 to 4 cm Renal Stones
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Kidney Stones
- Registration Number
- NCT02430168
- Lead Sponsor
- Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
Purpose: to investigate the postoperative outcomes of Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 2 to 4 cm kidney stones.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
- The patients who have 2 to 4 cm kidney stones
- ASA score within 1 to 3
Exclusion Criteria
- Previous surgical treatment including SWL
- Congenital abnormalities
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Analgesic demand Postoperative 24 hours Stone clearance 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying postoperative pain differences between RIRS and PCNL for 2-4 cm renal stones?
How does RIRS compare to PCNL in terms of analgesic demand and stone-free rates for large renal calculi?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict better outcomes with RIRS versus PCNL in upper urinary tract stone disease?
What are the potential adverse events associated with RIRS and PCNL in the management of 2-4 cm kidney stones?
How do RIRS and PCNL combination therapies compare to standard-of-care interventions for complex renal stone cases?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Diskapi TRH
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Diskapi TRH🇹🇷Ankara, TurkeyNihat KarakoyunluContact00905324747134