EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass: Comparison Between Negative Pressure and Slow-pull Technique
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Neoplasm
- Interventions
- Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration
- Registration Number
- NCT03111368
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Brief Summary
50 patients with pancreatic mass will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using two techniques: negative pressure and slow-pull. Cytological results will be compared.
- Detailed Description
The study will analyze the cytological results of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic mass using two different techniques of needle suction. Negative pressure and slow-pull. 50 patients with pancreatic mass will be submitted to four passes with both techniques. Each patient will be randomized to decide which technique will be first and subsequently on a alternated fashion until four passes are completed. Smear cytology and cell block preparations for each technique were obtained. The pathologist was blinded for the EUS-FNA technique.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1
- pancreatic solid mass
- endoscopic ultrasound non accessible lesions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description EUS- FNA Slow-pull Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using a stylet slow-pull technique of solid pancreatic mass EUS-FNA Negative Pressure Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration using negative pressure technique of solid pancreatic mass
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic yield 24 months cytological results after endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP
🇧🇷Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil