Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00620386
NCT00620386CompletedPhase 2

Comparing Intubating Conditions and Hemodynamic Changes Between Macintosh Laryngoscopy and Bonfils Fibrescope During Endotracheal Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade

Tehran University of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2006Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
intubating conditions

Study Overview

Brief Summary

We studied intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes during endotracheal intubation employing either Bonfils intubating fiberscope or the conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy in 80 healthy patients candidates for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation. We omitted neuromuscular blocking drugs from the induction regimen.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) are believed to be the dominating antigens causing bronchospasm and anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Avoidance of these drugs, however, renders compromised intubating conditions and higher morbidity with conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy. Thus, we compared Macintosh laryngoscopy with Bonfils intubation fibrescope without administering NMBDs.

METHODS:

Eighty male and female patients scheduled for elective surgery, aged 15 to 60 years, ASA class II or I, non-obese, with lower risk for difficult intubation were enrolled in this study. They were randomly allocated into the Bonfils group or the Macintosh group (40 each). Following adequate hydration and preoxygenation, midazolam 0.05 mg kg-1 was administered, followed by alfentanil 20 µg kg-1, lidocaine 1.5 mg kg-1, and propofol 2 mg kg-1 intravenously. Tracheal intubation was then carried out using Bonfils intubation fibrescope (Bonfils group) or employing conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy (Macintosh group). The primary outcome measure was the intubating condition, with mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate as secondary outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
15 Years to 60 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status was class I or II
  • •body mass index (BMI) < 30
  • •ability to assume the 'sniffing' position

Exclusion Criteria

  • •drug users
  • •expected to present difficult intubation
  • •history of oesophageal reflux
  • •any systemic or airway disease
  • •known allergy to the protocol medications

Arms & Interventions

1

Experimental

Intubation with Bonfils intubating fiberscope

Intervention: Bonfils (Device)

2

Active Comparator

Intubation with Macintosh laryngoscopy

Intervention: Macintosh (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

intubating conditions

Time Frame: 7 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • mean arterial pressure (MAP)(7 months)
  • heart rate (HR)(7 months)
  • Pulse Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)(7 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials