Clinical comparison between two different material as preventive measure for caries formatio
Not Applicable
Completed
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/09/045179
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Rashmi Lokhande
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 52
Inclusion Criteria
Age group of 6 to 12 years
first permanent bilateral mandibular molars that have partially or completely erupted with fissures either intact,sound or retentive which are stain or calcified but not caries
Normal healthy children
The willingness of patient to accept the treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
special child,a child with compromised systemic health
long-term medication affecting the salivary flow
children enrolled for other studies or fluoridation program
adverse reaction reported to any dental material
uncooperative child
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method considering dropout rates to 10 percent sample size will be 52 subjects and outcome is to compare and evaluate the clinical efficiency of conventional pit and fissure sealant and self etching self adhering flowable composite as a pit and fissure sealant at 3,6 and 12 months of interval. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: at 3 months,6 month 12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate clinically the marginal discoloration,marginal adaptation,retention,caries formation and surface roughness of pit and fissure sealant and self etching self adhering flowable composite as a pit sealant.Timepoint: 3,6 and 12 months