A Clinical Investigation of the M2a- 38™ Hip System
Terminated
- Conditions
- OsteoarthritisAvascular NecrosisNon-inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT00698503
- Lead Sponsor
- Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective clinical data collection is to document the performance and clinical outcomes of the M2a- 38™ Hip System
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 190
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients having primary cemented or cementless total hip replacement for non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composite diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, traumatic arthritis, subcapital fracture, legg perthes, slipped capital epiphysis, fracture of the pelvis, diastrophic variant.
- Patients with full skeletal maturity
- Patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty or bilateral total hip arthroplasty, either staged or simultaneously
- Patients of all races and gender
- Patients who are able to follow postoperative care instructions
- Patients who are able and willing to return for follow-up evaluations
- Patients have preoperative total Harris Hip Score less than 70 with at least moderate pain.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients diagnosed with inflammatory degenerative arthritis (IDJD) to include the following composite diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematous, pigmented villonodular synovitis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritic processes of inflammatory or autoimmune etiology.
- Patients less than 18 years.
- Patients with the presence of a previous prosthetic hip replacement device (any type, including surface replacement arthroplasty, endoprosthesis, etc.)in the hip joint to be operated.
- Patients with previous Girdlestone procedures.
- Patients with above the knee amputation of the contralateral and/or ipsilateral leg.
- Patients with osteoporosis, or marked bone loss which would preclude proper fixation of the prosthesis.
- Patients who are pregnant.
- Patients with an active or suspected infection in or around the hip.
- Patients with Parkinson's disease.
- Patients with vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease in the affected limb.
- Patients with severe instability or deformity of the ligaments and/or surrounding soft tissue which would preclude stability of the prosthesis.
- Patients with a highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g. immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, neoplastic disease, etc.).
- Patients unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program for a cemented or cementless total hip replacement or who indicate difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits prescribed by the study protocol.
- Patients with previous hip surgery or conditions that may interfere with the total hip replacement's survival or outcome, e.g., Paget's disease, Charcot's disease, severe osteoporosis compromising bone stock (Dorr type C bone).
- Patients who qualify for inclusion in the study, but refuse consent to participate in the study.
- Patients with a "fused" hip.
- Patients who have had a total hip arthroplasty on the contralateral hip within the last year.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Harris Hip Score 12 weeks, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of revisions and removals Any time
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the clinical outcomes of the M2a-38™ Hip System in osteoarthritis patients compared to standard hip prostheses?
What molecular mechanisms underlie the performance of the M2a-38™ Hip System in non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease?
Are there specific biomarkers that correlate with improved outcomes in avascular necrosis patients using the M2a-38™ Hip System?
What adverse events were observed in the M2a-38™ Hip System trial and how were they managed compared to traditional hip implants?
How does the M2a-38™ Hip System compare to other orthopedic implants like the Stryker Accolade or Zimmer NexGen in terms of long-term durability and patient mobility?