MedPath

Patient-specific Virtual Reality Rehearsal Prior to EVAR: Influence on Technical and Non-technical Operative Performance

Completed
Conditions
Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm
Registration Number
NCT01632631
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Brief Summary

Ongoing technological advances, especially in the field of image processing, have refined medical simulations to offer life-like replications of medical and surgical procedures in a variety of specialties. Patient-specific image data are incorporated into these simulations, and transformed into a 3D model. This enables the practitioner and his/her team to perform and practice 'real' cases on a virtual patient prior to performing the real procedure on the actual patient. This new technology has been referred to as 'patient-specific' rehearsal, also 'mission' or 'procedure' rehearsal.

Research has already proven that simulated patient-specific rehearsal of a carotid artery stenting procedure may enhance surgical and team performance.

The PROcedure rehearsal software can now also be used to practice patient-specific endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The ability to rehearse a challenging and complex procedure like EVAR may not only influence device selection based on preoperative planning, but also improve the technical performance of the surgeon/radiologist and the awareness and communication within the entire endovascular team. However, further research is needed to evaluate if this new technology may enhance clinical safety and efficiency, i.e. if patients actually benefit from physicians and team members conducting patient-specific rehearsals of EVAR interventions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

-infrarenal aortic aneurysm suitable for endovascular exclusion

Exclusion Criteria
  • Adult patients who do not have capacity to consent.
  • Previous stent-graft implanted in the abdominal aorta

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Errors occurring during EVAR procedure (Imperial College Error Capture record)during EVAR procedure
Technical operative metricsduring EVAR procedure

* C-arm positioning for proximal and distal landing zone

* Fluoroscopy time

* Number of angiograms

* Amount of contrast

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
30 day mortality and morbiditywithin the first 30 days after surgery
Subjective sense of realism of patient-specific rehearsal reported by team membersimmediately after EVAR procedure

Subjective sense of realism of patient-specific rehearsal reported by team members (Measurement: questionnaire)

Team satisfactionimmediately after EVAR procedure

Team satisfaction Measurement: questionnaire

Any deviation from initial treatment planimmediately after EVAR procedure
Technical and clinical success rateimmediately after EVAR procedure

* Successful access to the arterial system using a remote site

* Successful deployment of the endoluminal graft with secure proximal and distal fixation

* Absence of either type I or III endoleak

* Patent endoluminal graft without significant twist, kinks, or obstruction

Initial clinical successwithin the first 30 days after surgery

o Successful deployment of the endovascular device at the intended location, without:

* Death as a result of aneurysm-related treatment

* Type I or III endoleak

* Graft infection or thrombosis

* Aneurysm expansion (diameter \> 5mm)

* Aneurysm rupture

* Conversion to open repair

* Graft dilatation (≥ 20% by diameter)

* Graft migration

* Failure of device integrity

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Ghent University Hospital

🇧🇪

Ghent, Belgium

Sint - Maarten Hospital, Campus Rooienberg

🇧🇪

Duffel, Belgium

Zurich University Hospital

🇨🇭

Zurich, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath