跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02938039
NCT02938039已完成不适用

I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

King Saud University0 个研究点目标入组 112 人开始时间: 2015年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
112
主要终点
Airway Leak Pressure

研究概览

简要总结

This study will guide the anesthetists regarding the appropriate selection of the LMA in neonatal age group based on scientific basis.

This study will add up to existing literature about the safety of LMA usage in neonates and infants. Furthermore it may shed some light on which LMA type will be more feasible and effective for neonatal/ infants usage.

详细描述

Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are in practice of anesthesia since early 1980s. Pediatric and neonatal patients (including ex-premature) have also been benefited by the use of LMA. There are many advantages of LMA over endotracheal tube (ETT) in pediatric patients like ease of insertion, securing airway rapidly, avoidance of muscle relaxants, reduced incidence of sore throat, post operative hoarseness and coughing at the time of extubation, greater hemodynamic and intraocular pressure (IOP) stability. LMA has been recognized internationally in control of airway in difficult and failed intubation.

There are different types of pediatric LMAs available e.g. I-gel, ProSeal, LMA supreme, LMA classic, LMA unique, LarySeal and Ambu. These devices differ morphologically from each other (silicone, polyvinyl chloride or soft gel). There have been several randomized controlled studies comparing different LMAs in adults, however, the literature is sparse in which such comparison has been made in patients with weight 10 kg or below.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
1 Day 至 14 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Elective surgical procedures
  • No muscle relaxant agents
  • No other comorbidities

排除标准

  • Emergency surgical procedures
  • Full stomach
  • Subjects with upper respiratory tract infection
  • Failed caudal block

结局指标

主要结局

Airway Leak Pressure

时间窗: 17 months

It will be measured in mmHg unit and the expiratory valve will be closed with a fresh gas flow of 3 l.min-1 until an audible leak is heard, airway pressure will not be allowed to exceed 25 cmH2O), and then released completely

次要结局

  • Success at first attempt(18 months)
  • Oxygen Desaturation less than 90%(18 months)
  • Gastric Insufflation(18 months)
  • Manipulation of the Device(18 months)
  • Effective airway time(18 months)
  • Ease of insertion(18 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Abdulrahman Alzahem

Associate Professor and Consultant

King Saud University

相似试验