Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01349400
NCT01349400CompletedNot Applicable

Watchful Waiting vs. Repair of Oligosymptomatic Incisional Hernias

Charite University, Berlin, Germany1 site in 1 country636 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
636
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain/ discomfort during normal activities

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Watchful waiting is non-inferior to surgical repair of asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic incisional hernias in terms of pain and discomfort during normal activities.

Detailed Description

Incisional hernias are one of the most frequent complications in abdominal surgery. In Germany, 44.000 incisional hernia repairs per year are performed. Incisional hernia repair is not a low risk operation associated with high recurrence rate and high percentage of postoperative pain. Treatment of incisional hernias represents a significant surgical and socioeconomic problem. Until now, surgical treatment is recommended for patients with incisional hernia independent of symptoms due to the risk of an acute incarceration with serious complications. Studies defining the exact indications for incisional hernia repair and describing the natural course of an incisional hernia including the risk of an acute incarceration are not available to date. Randomized controlled trials having been performed in the past few years show that observation is a reasonable option in mildly symptomatic inguinal hernias. In this study, watchful waiting vs. surgical repair of oligosymptomatic incisional hernias are compared in a prospective-randomized setting for the first time.

The primary endpoint is pain during normal activities measured on the Surgical Pain Scales (SPS) after 24 months follow-up. SPS are a numeric analog scale (NAS) from 0 (no pain) to 150 (maximal pain). The primary endpoint will be dichotomized to no/minimal pain (SPS 0-30) and pain interfering with everyday activities (SPS > 30). Watchful waiting is non-inferior to surgical repair in case the upper border of the 95 % confidence interval will not include the value of 2.

Secondary outcomes are pain and discomfort during during sports, at rest, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and the frequency of incarceration. The investigators hypothesize that pain intensity during everyday activities is not different in the compared groups and that incarceration frequency is low. If this was the case, a watchful waiting strategy could be applied in oligosymptomatic incisional hernias and risks and costs for surgery could be saved.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 120 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age ≥18 years
  • •asymptomatic/ oligosymptomatic incisional hernia

Exclusion Criteria

  • •no hernia detectable by physical examination
  • •acute incarcerated hernia
  • •emergency hernia repair
  • •pain or discomfort associated with the hernia during normal activities
  • •local or systemic infection
  • •ASA score >3
  • •inability to complete or comprehend the preoperative questionnaire
  • •repair with biologic prothesis

Arms & Interventions

watchful waiting

Experimental

After informed consent and randomization into the watchful waiting group patients will receive standardized verbal information and written instructions on symptoms of acute incarceration. In case of acute symptoms they will be told to visit a physician immediately. On follow-up visits at 1 month, 12 months and 24 months the hernia size will be determined by physical examination, and the pain/ discomfort and the functional status will be monitored.

Control intervention/ reference test:

Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.

Intervention: Watchful waiting (Other)

Hernia repair

Active Comparator

Intervention: Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.

Intervention: Hernia repair (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain/ discomfort during normal activities

Time Frame: 24 months

Pain/ discomfort during normal activities as a result of the hernia or hernia operation 2 years after enrolment measured by the hernia-specific Surgical Pain Scale (SPS) on a 150 mm-scale ranging from "no pain sensation" to "most intense pain imaginable".

Secondary Outcomes

  • Frequency of acute incarcerations(24 months)
  • Patient satisfaction with care (5 point Likert scale)(24 months)
  • Pain/discomfort at rest /pain during sports /maximal pain(24 months)
  • Quality of Life (SF-36)(24 months)
  • Pain Disability Index(24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Johannes Lauscher

Principal Investigator

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials