跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05983640
NCT05983640招募中不适用

Just in Time Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation Trial (JITCPR-T): Comparison of a Brief Video to Traditional CPR Training: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Brigham and Women's Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 350 人开始时间: 2023年3月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
350
试验地点
2
主要终点
Performance of correct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (Objective Performance)

研究概览

简要总结

The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Just in Time (JiT) video as compared to the AHA Heartsaver® Course and no training (control) in ability to correctly perform CPR. The secondary objective is to assess skill retention 3-9 months after the AHA Heartsaver course with and without JiT Video use. The goal of this work is to study the effectiveness of this new JiT video to improve objective knowledge- and performance-based measures of effective OHCA response, as well as subjective ratings of preparedness and likeliness to respond, compared to the standard AHA Heartsaver® CPR AED Training course.

详细描述

The first responder phase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) response is most often led by bystanders with limited resources and no medical training. Bystanders play a critical role in the initial measures of the cardiac arrest chain of survival-activation of emergency medical services (EMS), initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and administration of defibrillation when indicated. Early bystander response, early bystander CPR, and defibrillation in under 8 minutes are associated with increased survival to hospital discharge.

Despite the clear importance of early bystander response to OHCA, rates of bystander CPR remain low with only one-third of OHCA patients receiving bystander CPR. Lay people with CPR training are more likely to perform CPR than those without training. Prior studies comparing traditional in-person training programs for CPR versus technology-enabled self-instruction (TESI) formats have demonstrated superiority or equivalency of TESI to prepare lay bystanders in OHCA response. Shorter duration and more convenient access to TESI in light of these findings provide a promising opportunity to increase public preparedness to participate in OHCA management at greater scales and lower costs. However, CPR-specific skills and knowledge deteriorate within 3 to 6 months of initial training, and time, location, and duration have all been perceived as barriers to completing CPR training.

The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Just in Time (JiT) video as compared to the AHA Heartsaver® CPR AED Training Course and no training (control) in ability to correctly perform CPR. The secondary objectives are the evaluation participate interaction with the JiT video and to assess skill retention 3-9 months after the AHA Heartsaver course with and without JiT Video use. The goal of this work is to study the effectiveness of this new JiT video to improve objective knowledge- and performance-based measures of effective OHCA response, as well as subjective ratings of preparedness and likeliness to respond, compared to the standard AHA Heartsaver® CPR AED Training course.

This is a prospective, randomized, three arm, open-label trial will two rounds of data collection. In the first round, participants will be randomized to one of three arms (no training, AHA course, JiT video) and assessed on CPR skills and knowledge. All participants will then be exposed to the other conditions (completion of the AHA Heartsaver® CPR AED Training course and viewing of the JiT video). During the second round, approximately 3-12 months later, the investigators will test the effectiveness of the JiT video at prompting correct CPR skills after previous training versus no prompting.

Specific aim 1: Determine the efficacy of an abbreviated JiT video-based curriculum in achieving competence in CPR by lay-persons as compared to individuals trained by the AHA Heartsaver® CPR AED Training course.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Employee of Gillette Stadium

排除标准

  • Age less than 18 years

结局指标

主要结局

Performance of correct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (Objective Performance)

时间窗: Measured within 2 hours of randomization, during the intervention

Correct CPR will be measured by successful completion of all five of the following actions: 1. Calling for 9-1-1 (as measured by verbalizing action to examiner) 2. Calling for automated external defibrillator (as measured by verbalizing action to examiner) 3. Placing hand in correct position on manikin chest (as measured by examiner) 4. Compressing at a rate of 100-120 per minute (as measured by examiner and through CPR manikin equipped with Laerdal QCPR software) 5. Compressing to a depth of at least 2 inches (as measured by examiner and through CPR manikin equipped with Laerdal QCPR software)

次要结局

  • Change in willingness to respond (Subjective Preparedness)(Measured within 1 hour before and immediately after skill evaluation completion)
  • CPR knowledge (Objective Knowledge)(Measured immediately after skill evaluation completion)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Eric Goralnick

Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine

Brigham and Women's Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验