*A prospective randomized multicenter study to demonstrate the superiority of the Barricaid® to discectomy for primary lumbar disc herniation*: Extended Follow-Up of the Barricaid® Annular Closure Device (ACD) Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Postmarket Cohort for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Interaction with Other Risk Factors
- Conditions
- lumbar disc herniationsciatica100432371004154310009720
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON55882
- Lead Sponsor
- Intrinsic Therapeutics, GmbH
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 66
Only subjects enrolled in the original RCT protocol EUBARD-CP-001 will be
eligible for long-term follow-up.
Original inclusion criteria included: subjects with radiculopathy (with or
without back pain), a positive straight leg raise (L4-5, L5-S1) or femoral
stretch test (L1-2, L2-3, L3-4), and a posterior or posterolateral herniation
at one level between L1 and S1 with radiographic confirmation of neural
compression using MRI who are found to have an anular defect (post discectomy)
which measures between 4mm and 6mm tall and between 6mm and 10mm wide, with a
minimum posterior disc height of 5mm, and failed at least 6 weeks of
conservative treatment.
Only subjects enrolled in the original RCT protocol EUBARD-CP-001 will be
eligible for long-term follow-up.
Subjects who have died or withdrawn consent during follow-up of RCT
EUBARD-CP-001 will not be included in the patient population eligible for this
long-term evaluation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The primary hypotheses of this extended follow-up post approval study extension<br /><br>are:<br /><br>• The Barricaid® ACD remains safe and effective at 10 years.<br /><br>• The Barricaid® ACD subjects do not have late or continued slow growth of<br /><br>lesions that lead to new or unexpected AEs or<br /><br>adverse clinical outcomes.<br /><br>• Development of osteoporosis does not negatively impact the progression of<br /><br>lesions observed and does not lead to new or<br /><br>unexpected AEs or adverse clinical outcomes.<br /><br>Sample size: This study extension is not powered to demonstrate statistical<br /><br>conclusions, but rather the sample size is based on<br /><br>the subjects from the original 2-year study who agree to participate in<br /><br>longer-term follow-up.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method