MedPath

Clinical Evaluation of Chronic Consciousness Disorders Using Resting-state EEG and ERP

Recruiting
Conditions
Disorders of Consciousness
Interventions
Other: no intervention
Registration Number
NCT05949528
Lead Sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Brief Summary

Currently, there are significant challenges in the clinical assessment of patients with consciousness disorders, such as distinguishing between vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), and predicting patient prognosis. This study aims to utilize different research techniques, such as auditory stimulation, as well as modified microstate methods, to enhance the disease classification and prognosis prediction of patients with chronic consciousness disorders.

Detailed Description

The investigators collected resting-state electroencephalograms (EEGs) and EEGs under various event-related potential (ERP) stimuli from patients with chronic consciousness disorders, and performed analyses on these data. The resting-state EEGs were subjected to spectral analysis and microstate analysis. The ERP EEGs were analyzed in the time domain, as well as for phase coupling and other measures.Using these computed indicators, the investigators use machine learning, deep learning, and other methods to predict disease classification and prognosis assessment in patients with chronic consciousness disorders.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients diagnosed with COMA /VS/MCS
  2. The course of disease was more than 4 weeks
  3. The vital signs were stable and able to tolerate the test process
  4. Complete skull
  5. Right-handed, no history of ear disease or hearing loss before onset
Exclusion Criteria
  1. History of epilepsy
  2. Sedatives
  3. Muscle relaxants and epileptic prophylaxis within 24 hours

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Healthy controls (HCs)no interventionHealthy controls (HCs)
Vegetative state (VS)no interventionVegetative state (VS): can open their eyes and preserve sleep-wake cycles, but unaware of themselves and their surroundings
Emerged from Minimally Conscious State (EMCS)no interventionEmerged from Minimally Conscious State (EMCS): recovery of functional object uses or communication from chronic
Minimally conscious state (MCS)no interventionMinimally conscious state (MCS): have reproducible signs of awareness and exhibit fluctuations in consciousness
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of each microstate6 months

The investigators conducted resting state EEG recordings on 59 patients with consciousness disorders and 32 healthy controls. The investigators refined the microstate method to accurately estimate topographical differences. The calculations were performed for measures of duration (ms). The duration of each microstate were utilized to predict disease classification and prognosis evaluation for patients with disturbance of consciousness.

Spectrum analysis of chronic disorders of consciousness6 months

The EEG of 59 patients with disturbance of consciousness will be collected in resting state and listening to music, and the absolute power spectral density values (alpha,beta,theta,delta bands dB/Hz) will be calculated using spectral analysis.

Occurrence of each microstate6 months

The investigators conducted resting state EEG recordings on 59 patients with consciousness disorders and 32 healthy controls. The investigators refined the microstate analysis. The calculations were performed for measures of occurrence (times per minute). The occurrence of microstates were utilized to predict disease classification and prognosis evaluation for patients with disturbance of consciousness.

Global explained variance (GEV) of each microstate6 months

The investigators conducted resting state EEG recordings on 59 patients with consciousness disorders and 32 healthy controls. The investigators refined the microstate analysis. The calculations were performed for measures of GEV (%). The GEV of microstates were utilized to predict disease classification and prognosis evaluation for patients with disturbance of consciousness.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)6 months

A GOS score ≥ 4 points is considered to indicate a good prognosis, while a GOS score \< 4 points is considered to indicate a poor prognosis

Coma Recovery Scale-Revised(CRS-R)30 minutes before samples collection

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score was utilized to measure the severity of the condition. It comprises 23 items arranged hierarchically into six subscales, including auditory, visual, motor, oromotor/verbal, communication, and arousal processes. Reflexive activity is represented by the lowest item on each subscale, while cognitively mediated behaviors are portrayed by the highest items. The scale ranges from 0 (indicating the lowest level of consciousness) to 23 (indicating the highest level of consciousness). Generally, a higher score suggests a better level of consciousness, while a lower score suggests a lower level of consciousness.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Yi Ling

🇨🇳

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath