MedPath

A Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years for People With Physiological and Psychosocial Distress

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Psychological Distress
Physiological Stress
COVID-19 Stress Syndrome
Interventions
Behavioral: Physical Activity Training
Other: Mindfulness-based Intervention
Other: Energy Conservation Techniques
Registration Number
NCT05459896
Lead Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Brief Summary

The negative impacts on physical and psychological health brought by COVID-19 seem to perpetuate in the post-pandemic era. It is estimated that there will be an impending mental health crisis in the general population in the aftermath of the pandemic due to the delayed negative impacts of COVID-19 and the associated non-pharmaceutical public health interventions such as social distancing, quarantining, and lockdown. Smart Health, defined as the provision of medical and public healthcare services by using mobile technologies, is a cost-effective and easily operated intervention that can provide various functions and can bring significant changes in people's health behaviour, such as prompting them to adopt a physically active lifestyle. Despite the rapid growth of digital health technology, most of them were developed during pandemic with a focus on delivering non-systematic, general virtual healthcare to people. The aim of this study is 1) to develop a Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (HAPPY) driven by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping Theory, and 2) to evaluate its efficacy of alleviating people's physiological and psychosocial distress during post-pandemic era. A total of 814 eligible participants, both COVID-19 victims and non-COVID-19 victims exhibiting physiological and/or psychosocial distress during post-pandemic era, will be recruited and randomized to either the experimental or the waitlist control group. The experimental group will receive a 24-week intervention combined with an 8-week regular supervision phase plus a 16-week self-help phase. Participants will receive different coping strategies, namely physical training, energy conservation techniques and mindfulness-based coping in the intervention hub at Level 2 based on participants' assessments at Level 1, and enhance self-management at Level 3. Participants' physical activity levels will be measured using commercial wearable sensors. The waitlist control group will receive materials on the promotion of physical and psychological health during waiting period and receive the same intervention as the experimental group in week 25. It is hypothesized that the experimental group will exhibit milder symptoms of physiological and psychosocial distress, and have a more positive appraisal mindset, greater self-efficacy, and more sustainable self-management ability than participants in the waitlist control group.

Detailed Description

Studies indicate that during the pandemic, people, particularly those COVID-19 survivors, are more likely to experience distress symptoms, including physical fatigue, decreased sleep quality, and body pain than during normal times. The abovementioned impacts on health can affect everyone during the COVID-19 pandemic. These negative impacts on physical and psychological health also seem to perpetuate in the post-pandemic era. It is estimated that there will be an impending mental health crisis in the general population in the aftermath of the pandemic due to the delayed negative impacts of COVID-19 and the associated non-pharmaceutical public health interventions such as social distancing, quarantining, and lockdown. Studies showed that around 10-30% of people who have contracted COVID-19 present with post-COVID-19 conditions, or "Long COVID", and among all the symptoms, physical and psychological complications such as depression, anxiety and reduced quality of life are commonly reported. This indicates an urgent need to identify an evidence-based intervention to address the health issues of people whose health has been affected by COVID-19.

Smart Health is defined as the provision of medical and public healthcare services by using mobile technologies, such as mobile phones, tablet devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and other wireless devices. A smart health intervention is a cost-effective and easily operated intervention that can provide various functions, including self-monitoring, data collection, real-time feedback, and notifications. Appropriate use of smart health-based interventions can bring significant changes in people's health behaviour, such as prompting them to adopt a physically active lifestyle. In a systematic review of 12 studies with a total of 3,469 participants, in which the effects of mobile app-based interventions were compared with those of the usual care, significant effects on health outcomes were found from using mobile apps to manage chronic diseases, such as improved physical functioning and increased medication adherence.

Despite the rapid growth of digital health technology, most of them were developed during pandemic with a focus on delivering non-systematic, general virtual healthcare to people. This research gap gives us the impetus to develop a 24-week intervention guided by an innovative three-level (Prevention, Protection and Progression) Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (here-and-after as HAPPY) driven by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping Theory (TMSCT) to address COVID-related physical and psychosocial distress symptoms of people during the post-pandemic era. The TMSCT emphasizes the use of appraisals to evaluate the harm, threats, and challenges that result in the process of coping with stressful events. The level of stress experienced (in the form of thoughts, emotions, and behaviours) as a result of external stressors depends on appraisals of the situation, which involves a judgement about whether the internal or external demands exceed an individual's resources and ability to cope when the demands exceed the resources. Positive emotions will be elicited when individuals are capable of resolving stressors with the utilisation of both internal (e.g. cognitive appraisals, emotion regulation) and external resources (e.g. social support, access to new knowledge and skills), while negative emotions will be elicited as a result of unresolved distress.

This protocol aims to evaluate the immediate effects (eight weeks after weekly supervised sessions, i.e. on the 8th week) and the mid-term effects (six months when the intervention has been completed; i.e., on the 24th week) of the HAPPY for alleviating people's physiological and psychosocial distress during the post-pandemic era. It is hypothesised that the experimental group will 1) exhibit greater improvement in physiological and psychosocial distress and 2) have a more positive appraisal mindset, greater self-efficacy, and more sustainable self-management ability than participants in the waitlist control group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
814
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 18 and older;
  • Exhibiting physiological and/or psychosocial distress:
  • A cutoff value of ≥ 20 in the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) will be used to indicate participants with psychological distress.
  • A cutoff value of ≥ 4 on the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) indicate participants with physical fatigue;
  • A cutoff value of > 5 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) indicate participants with decreased sleep quality;
  • A cutoff value of > 3 on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) indicates participants with pain, including headaches, upset stomach, and other forms of pain
  • Has access to the Internet and a smart phone
Exclusion Criteria
  • Individuals with any health conditions that could hamper participation in the Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (HAPPY), such as severe cognitive, visual, or hearing impairments.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental GroupPhysical Activity TrainingParticipants in the experimental group will be triaged to receive different types of interventions at Level 2, namely physical activity training, mindfulness coping strategies and energy conservation techniques, based on participants' screening and outcome assessment results at Level 1. These interventions will be taught in the 8-week regular supervision phase and self-practice during the 16-week self-help phase. The features in the Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (HAPPY) will be introduced to the participants in the first two sessions. In the other six sessions participants will be provided guidance in practicing the assigned intervention. Participants will self-practice the assigned intervention at home during 16-week self-help phase. At Level 3 Self-management, participants will be encouraged to work through a total of six thematic modules which aim to enhance participants' favourable appraisals of the current stress factors, to reduce stress levels and improve coping.
Experimental GroupMindfulness-based InterventionParticipants in the experimental group will be triaged to receive different types of interventions at Level 2, namely physical activity training, mindfulness coping strategies and energy conservation techniques, based on participants' screening and outcome assessment results at Level 1. These interventions will be taught in the 8-week regular supervision phase and self-practice during the 16-week self-help phase. The features in the Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (HAPPY) will be introduced to the participants in the first two sessions. In the other six sessions participants will be provided guidance in practicing the assigned intervention. Participants will self-practice the assigned intervention at home during 16-week self-help phase. At Level 3 Self-management, participants will be encouraged to work through a total of six thematic modules which aim to enhance participants' favourable appraisals of the current stress factors, to reduce stress levels and improve coping.
Experimental GroupEnergy Conservation TechniquesParticipants in the experimental group will be triaged to receive different types of interventions at Level 2, namely physical activity training, mindfulness coping strategies and energy conservation techniques, based on participants' screening and outcome assessment results at Level 1. These interventions will be taught in the 8-week regular supervision phase and self-practice during the 16-week self-help phase. The features in the Health Apps for Post-Pandemic Years (HAPPY) will be introduced to the participants in the first two sessions. In the other six sessions participants will be provided guidance in practicing the assigned intervention. Participants will self-practice the assigned intervention at home during 16-week self-help phase. At Level 3 Self-management, participants will be encouraged to work through a total of six thematic modules which aim to enhance participants' favourable appraisals of the current stress factors, to reduce stress levels and improve coping.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a simple measure of psychological distress which involves 10 questions about emotional states each with a five-level response scale. The scores on this scale range from 10 to 50 points, with lower scores reflecting better psychological health status. A cutoff value of ≥ 20 on the K10 scale indicates psychological distress.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score. The scores range from 0 to 21 points, with higher scores indicate poor sleep quality. A cutoff value \> 5 indicates poor sleep quality.

Changes of Numerical Pain Scale (NPS)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) is a self-reported questionnaire consists of 1 question measuring pain intensity. The scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicate greater pain. A cutoff value \> 3 indicates greater pain.

Changes of General Self-efficacy Scale (GSS)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSS) is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life. It measures 10 items on 4-point numeric scales. The scores range from 10 to 40 points, with higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.

Changes of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) is a self-reported questionnaire designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress. It consists of three subscales of depression, anxiety and stress, each contains 7 items on 4-point numeric scales. The score of each subscale has to be multiplied by 2 to obtain the total subscale scores. The total scores of each subscale range from 0 to 42 points, with higher scores indicate more severe depression/anxiety/stress symptoms.

Changes of Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) measures nine items on 10-point numeric scales for fatigue level and interference with daily life. A global fatigue score can be obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI. The total scores range from 0-10 points, with higher scores indicate greater fatigue. A cutoff value ≥ 4 on the BFI scale indicates intervention for fatigue.

Changes of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Short Form (CERQ-short)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Short Form (CERQ-short) is a validated, multidimensional questionnaire to identify the cognitive emotion regulation strategies (or cognitive coping strategies) someone uses after having experienced negative events or situations. It measures 18 items on 5-point numeric scales. There are a total of nine subscales measuring the domains of self-blame, acceptance, rumination, positive refocusing, planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, catastrophizing and other-blame. The total scores of the scale range from 0 to 90 points, with higher scores indicate higher cognitive emotional regulation ability.

Changes of Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R)Change from baseline to 24 weeks after the programme

The Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) is self-reported measure that assesses subjective distress caused by traumatic events. It measures 22-items on 5-point numeric scales. The scores range from 0 to 88 points, with higher scores indicate more severe Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath