Evaluation of two techniques of free gingival graft and palatal pedicle graft in soft tissue around the implant.
- Conditions
- Comparison of free gingival graft and palatal pedicle graft.
- Registration Number
- IRCT20221226056930N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 34
1patinets age over 18 years old. 2.Healthy in systemic and periodontal condition. 3.patients with stable implants 4. patients with adequate thickness of palate for graft harvesting. 5.patients with keratinized tissue width deficiency.
patients with history of radiotherapy or periodontitis.2. pregnant women or patients with a history more than 10-cigarrete smoking per day.3.patients who are undertreatment of drugs affecting periodontal tissue and wound healing.4.patients with a history of soft tissue grafting in site of surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Keratinized tissue width. Timepoint: Before intervention, 1month, 3month. Method of measurement: University of North California-15 probe.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Soft tissue surface shrinkage around implant. Timepoint: Before intervention, 1month after intervention, 3months after intervention. Method of measurement: Image j software.;Vestibular depth changes. Timepoint: Before intervention, 1month after intervention, 3months after intervention. Method of measurement: University of North California-15 probe.;Numeric analogue scale. Timepoint: Before intervention,1month after intervention, 3months after intervention. Method of measurement: Likert scale.;Amount of the analgesic pill used. Timepoint: Before intervention,1month after intervention, 3months after intervention. Method of measurement: Note in the postoperative form provided to the patient.