A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of RMT Medical Technology's SafeFlo® Vena Cava Filter
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Interventions
- Device: SafeFlo IVC Filter
- Registration Number
- NCT00654979
- Lead Sponsor
- RMT Medical Technologies, Ltd.
- Brief Summary
To determine the safety and effectiveness of the SafeFlo filter for permanent protection against pulmonary emboli. All patients will be selected to receive the filter according to the stated inclusion / exclusion criteria after consultation between the attending physician and interventional radiologist. Patients with a permanent implantation will be followed for up to 6 months. Clinical success will be defined as no occurrences of any of the following events: recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC occlusion or filter embolization. The proportion of permanent filter patients considered to be a clinical success will be the primary efficacy parameter.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 117
-
Traditional indications for vena cava filter in patients with established DVT or PE, including (40):
-
Patients with proven Pulmonary Embolus (PE) or Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and one or more of the following:
-
Contraindication to anticoagulation
-
Complication of anticoagulation
-
Failure of anticoagulation
- Recurrent PE despite adequate anticoagulation therapy
- Inability to achieve adequate anticoagulation
-
Poor compliance with anticoagulation medications
-
-
-
Extended indications for vena cava filter placement in patients with established DVT or PE, including the following (31, 40):
- Large free-floating thrombus in the iliac vein or IVC;
- Following massive PE in which recurrent emboli may prove fatal;
- During/after surgical or transcatheter embolectomy;
- Filter placement in high-risk trauma and orthopedic patients:
-
High risk trauma or orthopedic patients who cannot receive anticoagulation because of increased bleeding risk, and have one or more of the following injury patterns (31, 40):
- Severe closed head injury (GCS < 8);
- Incomplete spinal cord injury with para or quadriplegia;
- Complex pelvic fractures with associated long-bone fractures;
- Multiple long bone fractures.
-
Patients undergoing long-term immobilization (e.g., ICU or Surgical oncology)
- All patients under 18 years of age.
- All patients undergoing emergency procedures.
- All patients with abnormal IVC anatomy or pathology of the IVC such as thrombosis or tumor which prevent safe filter implantation.
- All patients with an IVC diameter which precludes oversizing of the filter platform.
- All patients with active infection / bacteremia.
- All patients with sensitivity to contrast media.
- Uncorrectable severe coagulopathy (e.g., patients with liver or multisystem failure).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Single arm SafeFlo IVC Filter SafeFlo IVC Filter
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical success will be defined as no occurrences of any of the following events: recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC occlusion or filter embolization. 6 months follow-up
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The proportion of patients with successful deployment of the filter will be calculated and presented with a 95% exact confidence interval. 3 and 6 months follow-up
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
Queen Margaret Hospital
🇬🇧Dumfermline, Scotland, United Kingdom
Universitas Hospital
🇿🇦Bloemfontein, South Africa
University Hospital Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria
Mt. Sinai Hospital
🇺🇸Manhattan, New York, United States
251 Air Force Hospital
🇬🇷Athens, Greece
Holy Name Hospital
🇺🇸Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Rabin Medical Center
🇮🇱Petach Tikva, Israel
Montefiore Medical Center
🇺🇸Bronx, New York, United States