Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03580044
NCT03580044TerminatedPhase 3

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED,OPEN-LABEL, COMPARATIVE STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF AZTREONAM- AVIBACTAM (ATM-AVI) AND BEST AVAILABLE THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS DUE TO MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT GRAM- NEGATIVE BACTERIA PRODUCING METALLO -Β-LACTAMASE (MBL)

Pfizer41 sites in 12 countries15 target enrollmentStarted: December 25, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Terminated
Sponsor
Pfizer
Enrollment
15
Locations
41
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Phase 3 study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel group, comparative study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aztreonam- avibactam (ATM- AVI) versus best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI) due to metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)- producing Gram-negative bacteria.

The study will randomize approximately 60 subjects in a 2:1 randomization scheme (ATM-AVI: BAT) with infections due to MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Molecular testing at the central microbiology laboratory will be performed to confirm the MBL status of the organism upon study completion or at pre-designated intervals.

The study will consist of a Screening Visit (Visit 1), a Baseline visit (Visit 2) on Day 1 of the study treatment, ongoing treatment visits (Visits 3 to 15) from Day 2 to Day 14, an End of Treatment (EOT) visit (Visit 16) within 24 hours after the last infusion, a Test of Cure (TOC) visit (Visit 17) on Day 28 (±3 days) and a Late Follow Up (LFU) visit (Visit 18) on Day 45 (±3 days).

Subjects will be stratified at randomization based on infection type (cIAI, HAP/VAP, cUTI or BSI). The number of subjects with cUTI will be no more than approximately 75% of the study population.

After obtaining written informed consent and confirming eligibility, subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to the ATM AVI treatment arm or the BAT treatment arm according to a central randomization schedule (approximately 40 (ATM AVI) and approximately 20 (BAT) subjects per group).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

ATM- AVI Aztreonam- Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Active Treatment Arm

Experimental

Intervention: ATM-AVI (Combination Product)

Best Available Therapy (BAT) Comparator Treatment Arm

Active Comparator

Intervention: BAT (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit -Microbiological Intent to Treat (Micro-ITT) Analysis Set

Time Frame: Day 28

Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response assessment was determined by a blinded independent adjudication committee. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the EOT Visit- ME Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set(Day 28)
  • Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set(Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization- Micro ITT Analysis Set(From randomization up to Day 28)
  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings(Baseline (last non-missing value observed before start of treatment on Day 1), EOT (Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14), TOC (Day 28))
  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the TOC Visit-Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set(Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit- Micro-ITT Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-ME Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events(From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until late follow-up visit (Up to Day 45))
  • Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Percentage of Participants With a Favorable Per Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit-ME Analysis Set(Day 28)
  • Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the EOT Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set(Up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)
  • Percentage of Pathogens According to Favourable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at the TOC Visit-Micro-ITT Analysis Set(Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Died Within 28 Days From Randomization-ITT Analysis Set(From randomization up to Day 28)
  • Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities(From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28))
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Hematology Assessments(From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28))
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry Assessments(From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28))
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)(From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 28))

Investigators

Sponsor
Pfizer
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (41)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials