Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/EUCTR2016-002707-25-IT
EUCTR2016-002707-25-IT
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1

Comparison between two therapeutic strategies for the maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis treated by infliximab (SCILLA). - n.a.

IRCCS ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS0 sites100 target enrollmentJanuary 13, 2021

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
patients with ulcerative colitis
Sponsor
IRCCS ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS
Enrollment
100
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
January 13, 2021
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
IRCCS ISTITUTO CLINICO HUMANITAS

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • \- Age 18 \-65 years
  • \- Written informed consent and willing to adhere to study procedures.
  • \- Therapy with infliximab since at least 12 months, with one infusion every 8 weeks (, according to the summary of product characteristics)
  • \- Sustained steroid\-free remission in the last 6 months prior to inclusion, except for use of steroids as a preventive measure for infliximab infusion reaction, if required by local guidelines.
  • \- Global Mayo score at baseline \= 2
  • \- All Mayo subscores \= 1
  • \- Absence of rectal bleeding
  • \- Effective methods to avoid pregnancy during the study period
  • Are the trial subjects under 18? no
  • Number of subjects for this age range:

Exclusion Criteria

  • \- Disabling and persisting extraintestinal manifestation at baseline
  • \- Patients unable to comply with study procedures
  • \- Known intolerance or previous allergic reaction to
  • thiopurines
  • \- Concomitant therapy with allopurinol
  • \- Any disease not compatible with the use of infliximab or azathioprine, as per clinician’s judgement.
  • \- Need for dose escalation of infliximab in the last 12
  • months prior to baseline.
  • \- White blood cell count \< 3000/mmc or absolute clinically relevant lymphopenia at baseline
  • \- Active pregnancy or breastfeeding, willing for pregnancy during the study period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
COMPARISON OF TWO THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR TREATING TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS POORLY CONTROLLED WITH BASAL INSULIN ASSOCIATED WITH ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS: 6-MONTH PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY - BASAL PLUS
EUCTR2005-002614-38-GBSANOFI AVENTIS GROUPE196
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Multi-arm randomized trial, comparing the efficacy of therapeutic strategies for at home early treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection) patients on the reduction of the risk of disease worsening
EUCTR2020-005890-29-ITFONDAZIONE RICERCA TRASLAZIONALE (FORT)810
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGDMajor depressive disorderMedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10025453Term: Major depressive disorder NOS
EUCTR2008-002319-42-SEEli Lilly and Company Limited1,160
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGDMajor depressive disorderMedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10025453Term: Major depressive disorder NOS
EUCTR2008-002319-42-SIEli Lilly and Company Limited1,160
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Strategies in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Not Exhibiting Improvement on Escitalopram Treatment: Early vs. Delayed Intervention Strategy - HMGD(a)
EUCTR2008-002319-42-FREli Lilly and Company Limited1,160