跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04876235
NCT04876235已完成不适用

Efficacy and Safety of Double-pigtail Plastic Versus Lumen-apposing Metal Stents for Transmural Drainage of Walled-off Necrosis

First People's Hospital of Hangzhou1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2021年5月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
clinical success (clinical improvement and resolution of WON)

研究概览

简要总结

Walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of solid and liquid necrotic material that is usually formed 4 weeks after an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. As the advances in endoscopic techniques and accessories, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a double mushroom head metal stent and a double pigtail plastic stent in the treatment of encapsulated necrosis of the pancreas.

详细描述

According to the revised Atlanta classification, pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) include acute peripancreatic fluid collections(APFCs) and acute necrotic collections(ANCs), which, over time, turn into pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Drainage of these PP and WON is required when they increase in size and become infected or become symptomatic.

Traditionally, WON has been managed surgically, however, surgical necrosectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when pursued early. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON).

Double-pigtail plastic stents(DPPS) is the earliest stent used for WON drainage in ultrasound endoscopy, however, These stents are limited by their small diameter leading to increased risk of stent obstruction. Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been increasingly used because of the advantage of better lumen apposition and wider diameter, improving access for endoscopic debridement. However, more adverse events(AEs) such as bleeding have been reported.

This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS in the treatment of Walled-off necrosis

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Obtention of a written informed consent
  • •According to Revised Atlanta Classification, abdominal CT/MRI and EUS were diagnosed as WON
  • •The diameter of WON ≥6cm
  • •Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire
  • •The distance between the EUS-probe and WON was < 1 cm.

排除标准

  • •No written informed consent
  • •pancreatic cystic tumor, pancreatic cancer and other benign and malignant tumors
  • •pancreatic pseudocyst
  • •WON too far from the stomach and duodenum to perform endoscopic drainage
  • •Serious abnormalities in liver and kidney function and coagulation function
  • •Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women

研究组 & 干预措施

LAMS group

Experimental

place LAMS under endoscopic ultrasound. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy(DEN) was performed through the LAMS with a forward viewing gastroscope if necessary

干预措施: endoscopic ultrasound (Procedure)

LAMS group

Experimental

place LAMS under endoscopic ultrasound. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy(DEN) was performed through the LAMS with a forward viewing gastroscope if necessary

干预措施: lumen-apposing metal stent (Device)

DPPS group

Active Comparator

Place DPPS under endoscopic ultrasound. When required, DEN was performed once the cystogastrostomy/duodenostomy tract had matured. This was done by first removing the stents followed by dilation of the tract with a radial expansion balloon and insertion of a forward viewing gastroscope through the tract for DEN

干预措施: endoscopic ultrasound (Procedure)

DPPS group

Active Comparator

Place DPPS under endoscopic ultrasound. When required, DEN was performed once the cystogastrostomy/duodenostomy tract had matured. This was done by first removing the stents followed by dilation of the tract with a radial expansion balloon and insertion of a forward viewing gastroscope through the tract for DEN

干预措施: double-pigtail plastic stents (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

clinical success (clinical improvement and resolution of WON)

时间窗: two months

compare rates of WON resolution in patients with LAMS and DPPS for treatment of walled-off necrosis

次要结局

  • Adverse Events(two months)

研究者

发起方
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jianfeng Yang

Deputy irector

First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验