Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02806401
NCT02806401
Completed
Not Applicable

Real-time Ultrasound-guided Axillary Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: Comparison With the Landmark Technique Subclavian Vein Catheterization

Seoul National University Hospital1 site in 1 country132 target enrollmentJune 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Cannulation
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Enrollment
132
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
2nd access success rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare landmark-subclavian venous access to ultrasound-guided axillary venous access when performed by pediatric anesthesiologists.

Detailed Description

Objective: Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. The investigators will compare the real-time ultrasound-guided axillary venous access vs. the landmark method- subclavian venous access in pediatric paticipants. (the needle insertion point of ultrasound-guided axillary venous is axillary vein. and the needle insertion point of landmark method is infraclavicular subclavian vein) Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Operating room of a tertiary medical center. Interventions: The investigators will compare the ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation (66 paticipants) vs. the landmark method (66 pa- ticipants).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2016
End Date
August 2017
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jin-Tae Kim

professor

Seoul National University Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • surgery under general anesthesia require central venous catheterization

Exclusion Criteria

  • hematoma in central vein central vein anomaly catheterization site infection

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

2nd access success rate

Time Frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds

Secondary Outcomes

  • 1st access success rate(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)
  • 3rd access success rate(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)
  • total time(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials