Real-time Ultrasound-guided Axillary Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: Comparison With the Landmark Technique Subclavian Vein Catheterization
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 132
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- 2nd access success rate
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare landmark-subclavian venous access to ultrasound-guided axillary venous access when performed by pediatric anesthesiologists.
Detailed Description
Objective
Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. The investigators will compare the real-time ultrasound-guided axillary venous access vs. the landmark method- subclavian venous access in pediatric paticipants. (the needle insertion point of ultrasound-guided axillary venous is axillary vein. and the needle insertion point of landmark method is infraclavicular subclavian vein)
Design: Prospective randomized study.
Setting: Operating room of a tertiary medical center.
Interventions: The investigators will compare the ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation (66 paticipants) vs. the landmark method (66 pa- ticipants).
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 1 Month to 7 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •surgery under general anesthesia require central venous catheterization
Exclusion Criteria
- •hematoma in central vein central vein anomaly catheterization site infection
Arms & Interventions
landmark
landmark method_subclavian venous cannulation
Intervention: landmark (Device)
US_Ax
ultrasound guided axillary venous cannulation
Intervention: US_Ax (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
2nd access success rate
Time Frame: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
Secondary Outcomes
- 1st access success rate(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)
- 3rd access success rate(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)
- total time(interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds)
Investigators
Jin-Tae Kim
professor
Seoul National University Hospital