Comparison of a Novel Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens (IOL) and a Trifocal IOL
- Conditions
- CataractQuality of LifeIntraocular Lens
- Registration Number
- NCT05262504
- Lead Sponsor
- Baskent University Ankara Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare visual performance and quality of life (QOL) following bilateral implantation of a novel non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof® IQ Vivity, Alcon, TX, USA) and a trifocal IOL (Acrysof® IQ PanOptix, Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) in a prospective comparative interventional case series.
- Detailed Description
Developments in cataract surgical devices and intraocular lenses (IOL) increased patient expectations and changed the practice patterns in ophthalmology. Nowadays, cataract surgery is considered as a refractive surgery. With multifocal IOLs, spectacle independence can be achieved with a good distance, intermediate and near visual acuity. This is associated with increased quality of life after cataract surgery.The most important disadvantages of multifocal IOLs are loss of contrast sensitivity and photic phenomena such as glare and halo. Although multifocal IOLs are more frequently associated with photic disturbances than monofocal IOLs, the trifocal IOLs have improved performance in photic phenomena when compared to bifocal IOLs. Recently, a new technology known as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs have been developed. These lenses create a single elongated focal point to enhance the depth of focus, improving intermediate vision without compromising distance vision. Although EDOF IOLs provide better intermediate distance vision when compared to monofocal IOLs, near vision is not as good as trifocal IOLs. The most important advantage provided by the EDOF technology is lower rate of photic disturbances than trifocal IOL designs. The aim of this study was to compare the visual performance and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes following bilateral implantation of a novel non-diffractive wavefront shaping EDOF IOL (AcrySof® IQ Vivity, Alcon Research, TX, USA) and a trifocal IOL (AcrySof® IQ PanOptix, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 52
- Cataract patients scheduled for surgery who are interested in spectacle independence.
- Bilateral cataract with plan of bilateral sequential cataract surgery.
- Adult patients older than 18 years of age
- Normal cognitive function, able to understand advantages and disadvantages associated with different types of IOLs.
- Ocular diseases other than cataract including irregular astigmatism, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration or any other retinal diseases, severe dry eye, glaucoma, amblyopia, uveitis, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, abnormal pupillary function, history of intraocular or corneal surgery, congenital eye abnormalities, or eye trauma.
- Patients with high myopia with axial length (AL) ≥ 26,5 mm and high hyperopia (AL ≤ 21.5 mm)
- Lifestyle and work-related factors requiring sharp near or distance vision
- Patients with unrealistic visual expectations.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Defocus-curves postoperative third month The monocular defocus curves were evaluated under photopic conditions using defocusing lenses from +0.50 D to -4.00 D in 0.50 D steps. The measurements were performed by adding the lenses to the CDVA.
Postoperative visual acuity with or without spectacle correction at near, far and intermediate distances postoperative third month uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA)
Quality of vision / dysphotopsia postoperative third month Dysphotopsia was assessed by the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire developed by McAlinden et al. The QoV is a validated Rasch-adjusted questionnaire in which patients are asked to rate specific dysphotopsia items depicted in standard photographs. Patients score each item (0, 1, 2, or 3) in relation to how frequent, severe, and bothersome their symptoms are (30 items in total). Lower QoV scores indicate a better quality of vision.
Vision-related quality of life (QOL) postoperative third month The vision-related QOL was assessed three months after the surgery by the VF-14 QOL questionnaire that was administered face-to-face by a trained researcher (İK). The grading scale was as follows: 0, no difficulty; 1, a little difficulty; 2, moderate difficulty; 3, quite difficult; 4, impossible to perform. Special care was taken not to influence the patients and to ensure that each question was fully understood.
Contrast sensitivity postoperative third month Monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity was assessed with the Pelli-Robson chart under photopic conditions at 3 meters.
Reading speed postoperative third month Reading speed was measured using the validated Turkish version of the MNREAD chart in photopic illumination conditions. It was recorded as number of words read by the patient in one minute (words per minute-wpm).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Baskent University Faculty of Medicine
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Baskent University Faculty of Medicine🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey