MedPath

Optimization of Ventilation Strategies in Preterm and Term Infants in a Single-center Intervention Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Lung-protective Ventilation
Respiratory Function Monitor
Interventions
Device: Ventilations while using a respiratory function monitor
Registration Number
NCT05512689
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

This study was a non-blinded, non-randomized intervention study in a single-center clinical setting, analyzing ventilation quality with and without RFM visibility.

Detailed Description

The study was conducted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and the delivery room at the Division of Neonatology, at the Medical University of Vienna.

We aimed to record ventilation parameters (tidal volume, mask leak, ventilation rate, PIP, PEEP) using a CE-certified Respiratory Function Monitor (Neo100, Monivent AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), which was either hidden or visible to the provider responsible for the airway (airway provider), during ventilations on term and preterm patients at the NICU and the delivery room.

The investigators aimed to determine the quality of ventilations performed by healthcare professionals depending on RFM visibility. Analysis occurred, determining whether observing the data displayed on the RFM during PPV of preterm and newborn infants lead to adjustments in applied pressure and an increase in the proportion of inflations performed within a predefined range of 4-8 ml/kg for VTe.

The investigators hypothesized that using a RFM with numeric and graphical display of values during positive pressure ventilation of infants will lead to i) more frequent recognition and correction of tidal volumes outside the predefined range and ii) reduction of mask leak.

This knowledge gain may improve future training using a RFM to improve the quality of ventilations and, thereby, patient safety.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and in the delivery room who receive positive pressure ventilation
  • Written consent from parents or legal guardians of patients
  • Preterm and term infants (male and female, any gestational age)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Healthcare professionals or parents/legal guardians, representing their children, that do not consent to participation in this study
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interventional groupVentilations while using a respiratory function monitorIn the interventional group, healthcare professionals will ventilate the infants using the RFM and are able to adapt their ventilations according to the RFM feedback.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of ventilations with VTe between 4-8ml/kgthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

percentage of ventilations within range divided through all ventilations performed, for each participant

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean value for peak inflation pressurethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

defined as \> 35 cmH2O

Occurrence of insufficient tidal volume (defined as <4mL/kg) as a proportion of ventilations given (face mask and endotracheal tube)through study completion, an average of 1 year

defined as \< 4ml/kg

Occurrence of excessive tidal volume (defined as >8mL/kg) as a proportion of ventilations given (face mask and endotracheal tube)through study completion, an average of 1 year

defined as \> 8ml/kg

Comparison of elective versus delivery room interventionsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

mean values for all evaluated ventilation parameters (VTe, leak, PIP, rate) for this comparison

Mean value for ventilation rate (defined as ventilations per minute)through study completion, an average of 1 year

defined as ventilations per minute

Mean value for mask leak and proportion of ventilations with excessive mask leak (defined as >50%) during all ventilationsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

defined as \> 50%

Comparison of ventilations via face mask vs. endotracheal tubethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

mean values for all evaluated ventilation parameters (VTe, leak, PIP, rate) for this comparison

Outcome data and adverse eventsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

this included diagnoses (i.e., bronchopulmonary dysplasia \[BPD\], persistent ductus arteriosus \[PDA\], IVH, periventricular leukomalacia \[PVL\], and pneumothorax) and the time frame of occurrence (within 24 hours, one week, or during the total hospital stay). BPD was defined as the need of any respiratory support at the GA of 36 weeks, evaluated for infants below 32+0 weeks GA. IVH was determined using the DEGUM classification

Comparison of fellows vs. consultantsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

mean values for all evaluated ventilation parameters (VTe, leak, PIP, rate) for this comparison

Comparison of sef-inflating-bag vs. neo-Tthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

mean values for all evaluated ventilation parameters (VTe, leak, PIP, rate) for this comparison

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Vienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath